That isn't correct. Between easygoing and orderly, I'm overall quite orderly--just not when it comes to keeping my belongings tidy.
If you say so - I also notice you type as INFp Ni in Socionics - why the P in Socionics (obviously, for perceiving).. but the J in dichotomy? (Which you know, you have to pick the J responses to get).
I see the same thing. I fell for the same little trick.
INFp in Socionics is
absolutely nothing like the MBTI INFJ. The Ni in Socionics directly contradicts the MBTI J dichotomy in a bout a trillion different ways - here's a little snippet of the IEI-Ni subtype from Sociotypes.com that directly opposes a J preference:
Dislikes routine, monotony, stereotypes, conventionality, strict order, having to follow rules and regulations.
To actually return an IEI-Ni result you have to make
very different choices to the ones you have to make to get J in dichotomy. If the glove don't fit..
But, I get it - trust me, for probably two years I denied the INTP typing by dichotomy, on the basis that I know I'm an introverted intuitive type, which sounds absolutely insane, but because MBTI turns INTP into Ti-Ne, I couldn't get on board with that, I know I'm not a "Ti" dominant type, I'd pick J if I was a T type after all, really. This knowledge that I am an "Ni" type affected my reasoning and crept subconsciously into influencing certain results to start returning not just a J result, but literally a "Very Strong" J result on the official MBTI test online - this is such complete crap, and it comes from the fact that I know I'm an "Ni" type and was obviously, without intending to, seeking to return a J result because that's what indicates an "Ni" type, which I already know is accurate.
But this is flawed. The function stacks are applied after the fact, they're not tested for in any way whatsoever in the MBTI, they've got no credibility
at all. Getting a J in dichotomy in no way that makes any sense means a person is a dominant perceiving type, it's just total nonsense. Eventually I determined that I'm correct and this bullshit forced IEIE/EIEI thing is well, bullshit, and I feel comfortable accepting that INxP is accurate, and INxP reflects a person that is dominated by Introversion, Intuition and
Perceiving. This makes sense with my Socionics type (ILI-Ni) and I'm no longer struggling to make sense of how things don't add up. When things don't add up, our brains do all kinds of weird shit to make it add up. But it doesn't.
I'm still kinda torn between F and T to be honest, I think I'm more T than F but eh. I don't really care about this bit much.
I'm just saying - I get what's going on, I've been through it already, the fact of the matter is INFJ does not equal Ni dominant and it doesn't make any sense to be a J in MBTI and also Ni or INFp in Socionics because you have to literally make the opposite choice in questions that are very much the same. If there's one single thing the IEI-Ni isn't, it's an MBTI J.