DestroyTheSpineless
Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 33
- Enneagram
- 5
I took my time to devolop my own hypothesis.
[MENTION=33733]Straylight[/MENTION]: I think you're right. I might be not an ILI. I just cannot have such a highly developed Ti as demonstrative function. Also, I agree with you about being rational and static as well. One time, it was striking, doing the SOLTI-160, to see my rational preference even if I resulted as ILI. By the way, I've always tested as LII on most tests and I relate more to the LII description.
Here's my try: I'm a LII-Ti. This type would comprehensively explain why some people typed me as ILI. Since this is the rational subtype of LII and Ti is its leading function, LII-Ti would be the inert subtype. This means that all of LII's inert functions (1, 4, 6 and 7 - Ti, Se, Si, Te) are more visible in the person. The contrary is for the contact functions (2, 3, 5, 8 - Ne, Fi, Fe, Ni). This would be enough to explain why:
- Most people saw a high Se;
- Most people saw a high Te;
- I don't think I have a high Ne: in fact, I would use it only to support my highly valued Ti.
So, do you think it's accurate?
[MENTION=33733]Straylight[/MENTION]: I think you're right. I might be not an ILI. I just cannot have such a highly developed Ti as demonstrative function. Also, I agree with you about being rational and static as well. One time, it was striking, doing the SOLTI-160, to see my rational preference even if I resulted as ILI. By the way, I've always tested as LII on most tests and I relate more to the LII description.
Here's my try: I'm a LII-Ti. This type would comprehensively explain why some people typed me as ILI. Since this is the rational subtype of LII and Ti is its leading function, LII-Ti would be the inert subtype. This means that all of LII's inert functions (1, 4, 6 and 7 - Ti, Se, Si, Te) are more visible in the person. The contrary is for the contact functions (2, 3, 5, 8 - Ne, Fi, Fe, Ni). This would be enough to explain why:
- Most people saw a high Se;
- Most people saw a high Te;
- I don't think I have a high Ne: in fact, I would use it only to support my highly valued Ti.
So, do you think it's accurate?