Actually, real-life ENTPs are quite likable. Online ENTPs are hit-or-miss. Basically, just skip past the "fight over ideas for fun" game, and just stick with exchanging interesting ideas with an INTJ (show off your cool ideas), and you'll be fine. Oh, and do not lightly accuse an INTJ of being dishonest w/r to ideas, especially during a serious debate: we are (usually) not intentionally dishonest, so accusations such as that tell us that you're not "being serious" and not worth listening to. Accusing an INTJ of dishonesty is effectively the "nuclear option." If we
are being dishonest, you have a very serious problem, far beyond the question of who "wins" the argument.
Check out
Richard Feynman's style of presentation in the Messenger Lectures series in Project Tuva.. He is often typed as ENTP due to his antics depicted in several autobiographical books about his life. However, his presentations in these lectures are clear, concise, to the point, very proficiently using Te. There's even a section where he explains Babylonian vs Greek approaches to mathematics, where - in MBTI terms - Babylonian is very Te, with no formal rules, while Greek is very Ti, starting from first principles and axioms. He clearly conveys exactly
how physicists think about physics. If he can communicate complicated ideas this clearly, there's no reason any ENTP can't do the same. (Or he's a seriously mistyped INTJ!)
"Deep pool of thought"
...
"Deep thought"
...
42!