• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Random Politics Thread

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,150
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
So if you want to know what happened at Social Security Administration in mid-February (at least, from one of the execs before it was taken over -- here is her affidavit, which means she's legally liable for any mistruth), here you go.

(I attached it to the post -- if it doesn't show up, I'll see about finding a more easily linked copy.)

It gels with my observations but disturbs me more, with how it heavily implicates Russo who is the new CIO in charge of systems.

Also, if you are curious about some of the accusations against SSA, there is explanation in the affidavit about them and why they seem to not be data-driven. It also explains how big a deal the protection of Personally Identifying Information (PII) is for the agency and the safeguards that were completely overrun.

If you're interested about SSNs, basically you have claims that a claimant (the person making the claim) makes against their own number, but there are also benefits where the claimant will be making them on the Number Holder (like widow/widowers -- the spouse is making a claim on their deceased spouse's SSN, who is the Number Holder; or perhaps one of a few types of child claims where the parent is the Number Holder, etc). The claim includes both numbers (Number Holder and Claimant) so you can tell who is receiving the benefit but on whose account the benefit is based. The claim process is complex, and you have to understand what the various claims are and what they are based on, or you will misunderstand what you're looking at -- very much like when people looked at the Numident (which is the master file of everyone who has had an SSN) and assumed wrongly that all of those people are receiving benefits (which is such an easy mistake to remedy with just one or two questions). There are other files like the MBR (T2) and the SSR (T16) that actually have the records of who is receiving what payments.
 

Attachments

  • FILE_1176.pdf
    3.8 MB · Views: 25
Last edited:

SensEye

Active member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
876
MBTI Type
INTp
There are a number of people regularly taking Trump to task. Some seem to be working more locally, like AOC. Others like Bernie Sanders are travelling around the country. Congressional democratic leadership do speak out but have not been nearly forceful or coordinated enough. It doesn't help that their efforts receive minimal coverage in mainstream news. So much for liberal media bias. Their bias is toward their wealthy sponsors and donors.
I agree with you here. I have heard a number of Democrats give very valid and rational criticisms of Trump's policies on CNN and a few other media outlets. However, they are various folks I have never heard of. There is no consistent voice out there as far as I can tell

I want to see someone who is a likely primary candidate as the next POTUS repeatedly nailing Trump to the wall week after week. Not AOC or Bernie (who have been consistent in their messaging admittedly) but I don't think the average voter is paying them any heed as they are considered "too far to the left". The Democrats need a centrist voice who can avoid any woke/progressive baggage and who is consistently front and center with anti-Trump messaging. I think such an individual, if they can come to the fore, could do away with the whole MAGA crazy train. But no such individual is on the radar as far as I know.

As I mentioned, it's probably going to be Newsome in 2028 for the Dems. I am not yet convinced he is the answer.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,397
MTG calling for measels parties. Gonna get a bunch of people killed.
Intel lapse to Ukraine allowing for Russian sneak attacks. Gonna/Getting a bunch of people killed.
Kristi Noam hunting "leakers" in HLS department. Gonna get a bunch of people and dogs killed.
Wild Fires now in New York.

Let's dance in style, let's dance for a while
Heaven can wait, we're only watching the skies
Hoping for the best but expecting the worst
Are you gonna drop the bomb or not?
Let us die young or let us live forever
We don't have the power but we never say never
Sitting in a sandpit, life is a short trip
The music's for the sad men
Can you imagine when this race is won
Turn our golden faces into the sun
Praising our leaders, we're getting in tune
The music's played by the, the mad man...
 

Coriolis

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Staff member
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
27,498
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I agree with you here. I have heard a number of Democrats give very valid and rational criticisms of Trump's policies on CNN and a few other media outlets. However, they are various folks I have never heard of. There is no consistent voice out there as far as I can tell

I want to see someone who is a likely primary candidate as the next POTUS repeatedly nailing Trump to the wall week after week. Not AOC or Bernie (who have been consistent in their messaging admittedly) but I don't think the average voter is paying them any heed as they are considered "too far to the left". The Democrats need a centrist voice who can avoid any woke/progressive baggage and who is consistently front and center with anti-Trump messaging. I think such an individual, if they can come to the fore, could do away with the whole MAGA crazy train. But no such individual is on the radar as far as I know.

As I mentioned, it's probably going to be Newsome in 2028 for the Dems. I am not yet convinced he is the answer.
I don't think Newsome is the answer either. And, I don't think Bernie or AOC are too liberal. After all, both Trump and AOC won her district soundly. She reached out to her constituents after the fact to ask why, to help her better understand their concerns and their mindset. It seems they went for those two almost diametrically opposite candidates because they saw both as anti-establishment, people would create revolution, of one kind or another. If nothing else, the last couple elections showed Democrats in the typical mold won't get elected in this climate. They need someone who will be as much of an iconoclast as Trump, but in a constructive way that helps ordinary folks rather than oligarchs and corporations. Bernie is probably too old and AOC too young, but we need someone in their mold.
 

Red Herring

middle-class woman of a certain age
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
7,909
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
(Sikorski is the Polish foreign minister)

rue6y92j0pne1.png
GlneWKqaEAAUBbd.jpg:large





Silly paranoid Europeans ...

EDIT:

GlnLv72XEAA24Fj
Glq-g1VXsAAQW7R.png
 
Last edited:

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
22,105
I don't think Newsome is the answer either. And, I don't think Bernie or AOC are too liberal. After all, both Trump and AOC won her district soundly. She reached out to her constituents after the fact to ask why, to help her better understand their concerns and their mindset. It seems they went for those two almost diametrically opposite candidates because they saw both as anti-establishment, people would create revolution, of one kind or another. If nothing else, the last couple elections showed Democrats in the typical mold won't get elected in this climate. They need someone who will be as much of an iconoclast as Trump, but in a constructive way that helps ordinary folks rather than oligarchs and corporations. Bernie is probably too old and AOC too young, but we need someone in their mold.

Newsome is basically another Harris. His odds of winning Midwest battlegrounds are pretty slim if Trump doesn't mess up completely. What is pretty poor game plan however you turn it. The party needs to find people that are middle aged, rational, generally likable and they aren't swimming in various interest groups whole 24 hours a day. In other words they are "normal".
 

ceecee

Coolatta® Enjoyer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
16,334
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
8w9
I agree with you here. I have heard a number of Democrats give very valid and rational criticisms of Trump's policies on CNN and a few other media outlets. However, they are various folks I have never heard of. There is no consistent voice out there as far as I can tell

I want to see someone who is a likely primary candidate as the next POTUS repeatedly nailing Trump to the wall week after week. Not AOC or Bernie (who have been consistent in their messaging admittedly) but I don't think the average voter is paying them any heed as they are considered "too far to the left". The Democrats need a centrist voice who can avoid any woke/progressive baggage and who is consistently front and center with anti-Trump messaging. I think such an individual, if they can come to the fore, could do away with the whole MAGA crazy train. But no such individual is on the radar as far as I know.

As I mentioned, it's probably going to be Newsome in 2028 for the Dems. I am not yet convinced he is the answer.
If he is, they will lose. He is just as poor of a candidate as Kamala was. Either the Dems start understanding that you can't win an election against the extreme fashy right wing with a center right candidate or they keep losing elections.

I do love the idea of Chuck Schumer getting primaried though.
 

SensEye

Active member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
876
MBTI Type
INTp
I don't think Newsome is the answer either. And, I don't think Bernie or AOC are too liberal. After all, both Trump and AOC won her district soundly. She reached out to her constituents after the fact to ask why, to help her better understand their concerns and their mindset. It seems they went for those two almost diametrically opposite candidates because they saw both as anti-establishment, people would create revolution, of one kind or another. If nothing else, the last couple elections showed Democrats in the typical mold won't get elected in this climate. They need someone who will be as much of an iconoclast as Trump, but in a constructive way that helps ordinary folks rather than oligarchs and corporations. Bernie is probably too old and AOC too young, but we need someone in their mold.
We'll just have to disagree as to whether Bernie or AOC are too liberal. I think a majority of American's think they are. The Democrats need to move to the center and away from progressive politics. That is the whole reason for Trump's rise in the first place.

VG refers to "if Trump doesn't mess up completely..." Trump is showing every sign that is exactly what he will do. I have faith he will get even more erratic and chaotic as time goes by. So the Dems just need a reasonable candidate to scoop up the center 30% or so. Let's face it, progressives are going to vote Democrat no matter what, and MAGA will stick with the Republicans no matter what. It's that middle chunk that is going to tilt the balance and the Dems need to start courting them.

Alas, the Dems still seem to be adrift at sea, with only the usual progressives making noise. If there is even a mainstream branch of that party currently functioning, they sure are quiet.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,150
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
JFC. Now add the destruction of federal records to the other atrocities currently unfolding...
... cuz hey, if you're already guilty of treason and rights violations and stock market jiggering and other financial crimes, who really cares about the Federal Records Act of 1950, etc? Might as well go the whole way at this point.

 

SensEye

Active member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
876
MBTI Type
INTp
Or not. Who knows as he changes his mind hourly. I think the latest is another meeting on Thursday to haggle some more. But I guess the whole 25% on everything comes back April 2nd regardless. Maybe. Unless the automakers tell him they can't build new factories in a month. Then we'll be off to May 1 I guess.

But hey, the White House is now a Tesla show room. Come on down! At least Trump is consistent in is inconsistency, as he has repeatedly criticized EVs in the past.

Let's see how bad he is about to screw Ukraine with his ceasefire proposal.
 
Top