• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Random Movie Thoughts Thread

Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
In the book the implication is that the vampire is a bisexual forigner coming to hypnotize you and your girlfrind into sucking on parts of people in a most flusterating way. Its kind of a fun bromance between five men who unite in their quest to stick their hard wood into another guy.
I appreciate the confirmation. Even in a book that's over one hundred years old, Dracula is about sex, and that's probably the case for every vampire that came after him.
 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
1000003398.jpg
 
Last edited:

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,403
I appreciate the confirmation. Even in a book that's over one hundred years old, Dracula is about sex, and that's probably the case for every vampire that came after him.
Except, its not about sex. It's written in the perspective of various journal/diary sections. It's a book about a mystery, its a book about horror. Its a book about trauma bonds, sanity vs insanity, love vs lust, and the emotional responses to both that come from living in a society where: "There's no such things as monsters" and yet, here they all are. It's about changes, and how people resist them.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Rewatched The Creator again (since my 4K copy arrived a few days early).

Such a beautiful film. The shot composition is immaculate and artistic, and the lighting is just absolutely stellar.

The general world-building is great.

It's a bit of a frustrating film, as it's like the anti-TENET (an apt comparison with Washington starring in both films). TENET is cold and rational almost to a fault, making it hard to identify with or find an emotional keyhole by which to enter, even while the pieces fit together like clockwork. The Creator is very emotional sometimes at the expense of logic and coherence. It knows what it is trying to sell and leans hard into it, but it would have benefited from a final pass through by a more skilled/rational screenwriter to really pull it together logistically and thematically. I suspect this is what happened with Rogue One too but then they brought in Tony Gilroy. (Chris Weitz was involved in both films, so he might be the culprit -- also, he worked with Zemeckis to write that real dog of a Pinocchio film last year, which he can't really be forgiven for.)

Basically it's the difference between it being an enjoyable and sometimes breathtaking film that you have to overlook some of the things that don't make sense (especially when it comes to how characters get from here to there in a certain span of time, or how certain deceptions occur, or just a host of similar things) and having an actual masterpiece, which this film might have been if only the narrative had been polished and tightened. Still it's admirable for what it was trying to achieve and for some really breathtaking moments. It definitely makes you feel and has a vision, rather than being inert and lifeless.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Except, its not about sex. It's written in the perspective of various journal/diary sections. It's a book about a mystery, its a book about horror. Its a book about trauma bonds, sanity vs insanity, love vs lust, and the emotional responses to both that come from living in a society where: "There's no such things as monsters" and yet, here they all are. It's about changes, and how people resist them.
If it's about lust, isn't it at least partially about sex? I would expect the book is about dealing with temptations both tempting and terrifying; the snake trying to entice you into eating the forbidden fruit, and the ruin of your soul. People were much more religious back then and probably viewed sex outside of marriage exactly in that way, which is why a horror novel about that would be so successful; it tapped into fears people actually had.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,403
If it's about lust, isn't it at least partially about sex? I would expect the book is about dealing with temptations both tempting and terrifying; the snake trying to entice you into eating the forbidden fruit, and the ruin of your soul. People were much more religious back then and probably viewed sex outside of marriage exactly in that way, which is why a horror novel about that would be so successful; it tapped into fears people actually had.
What then is a lust for power, or control?
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Okay, since this film predates this forum -- here's my comments about the Titanic 4K release that just came out this December.

First, technical merits -- even with some alterations in our understanding of the disaster in the last 20 years or more, Cameron's work is a technical masterpiece in terms of set design, costuming, production values, pretty much anything related to the event + technical excellence in film production. The 4K transfer is no different: It is absolutely stellar and worth getting if you have 4K and care at all about this film, and maybe even if you don't. It's just mind-blowing to watch and listen to.

Now to the film itself: This is a frustrating film in some ways; as mentioned before, I feel like Cameron's writing skills loosened a bit after T2. (I can't recall much of True Lies.) Usually Cameron's stuff (especially his Director Cut versions) are really tight and solid and rational works, even while being emotionally moving. But here, I feel like some of the banter (esp in first half of the film) is more clumsily written, and a few scenes just feel awkward (like when Jack and Rose banter).

I am really frustrated by Jack (DiCaprio) in this film. Both he and Winslet are young (22 and 23 years old, I believe), although both are experienced. But a lot of Jack's dialogue early in the film seems clunky in how it is delivered. I can't tell whether it's because of the writing itself or because Cameron did not direct DiCaprio in a way that elevated the performance and made it mesh with the rest of the cast. Yes, Jack is different and they want to play off he's an uncultured rogue versus the stuffy elite, but some of it often feels inane or comes across as belonging in a different film.

The rest of the cast seems to typically understand the assignment. Billy Zane (as Hockley) could have been a real caricature but despite being just a jerk manages to feel in sync with the other actors, and the same with David Warner as his constable-turned-enforcer Lovejoy. Kathy Bates also plays a poor woman who is new money -- she manages to bridge that gap. But DiCaprio doesn't seem to know how to approach his lines.

There's also dumb moments of excess, like the sweaty hand slapping the glass bit.

I'm also not a Gloria Stewart fan. She feels like she is reciting her lines so often, rather than feeling them, and she doesn't quite feel like Winslet's Rose. It's softened a bit because someone of her age from that time often has that kind of style, but... I wish she had felt a bit more natural. Still, I guess you don't have a lot of selection of actresses who look 100.

On the other hand, the film feels huge, and because it's so technically and set-wise done well, it really feels like you're there. The threat is real. And as much as I cut up Jack above as a character, the thing is this is really a great film about liberation and sacrifice and agape (aside from romantic) love.

Rose is trapped and miserable. She feels like she has to marry someone she loathes and behave for the rest of her life in a way to honor her family and mother. But she's dying inside, to the point she's about to kill herself (possibly). Jack is her lifeline, he shows her it is possible to live without knowing what tomorrow brings and how to be resilient enough to survive and thrive regardless of what resources you DON'T have. Jack recognizes Rose's dying spirit and takes great initiative to give her an opportunity (which he ultimately leaves with her, as he should have).

Maybe that sappy moment of "flying" on the front of the boat seems silly to some, but when you are terrified of leaving your life behind but can no longer live in the cage and step out, that is what it feels like. She is free. She's left all the chains behind. I actually love the moment when they merge in the car because Rose is the quiet, completely calm one -- and Jack (normally the energizer and instigator) is kind of terrified and unsure of himself. It's like he brought Rose to a place of peace, and now she is his place of peace and refuge. Despite this in some ways being a quick fling that never got to stand the test of time, Jack proves himself again by never abandoning Rose aside from trying to get her on a boat (while setting himself up to die), and then guiding her through surviving the Titanic's sinking, and then even giving her the place on the headboard that only had boyancy enough for one. ANd he makes her promise that she will never ever quit even when he leaves her, because he wants her to live.

I am usually just a sobbing mess at the end when it shows old Rose sleeping (perhaps not to reawake) and the camera slowly scans her night table full of all the photos she thought important enough to bring on this trip -- and it is all these old pictures of things she and Jack were going to do together, that she went ahead and did without him as part of honoring her promise to him. His words were prescient -- in part because Rose honored his memory and lived her life to the fullest. There's even a picture of her mounted on a horse "like a man" and not riding sidesaddle like a fluff.

Some people have criticized Rose for having a husband and raising a family all these long years, yet still pining for Jack. How could she not? Jack knew her only briefly, but he gave her her life. She was dying, and he gave her her life back, at cost of his own, without rancor or complaint. It's kind of amazing when they reach Ellis Island and she is looking up at the Statue of Liberty, and she hides from Hockley and gives her name as Rose Dawson on the registry.

So it's like although some of the execution of Jack's early dialogue was meh, the actual kernel of the story -- the impact he has on Rose -- is just very profound and moving for me. I am always conflicted when I watch this.

There's some other great stuff, all the supporting characters get their moment -- the captain standing in his office to go down with the ship, as well as the sweet architect (Anderson) feeling such remorse over not building a better boat, Rose's mother never really getting beyond herself and effectively losing her daughter, Ismay abashedly hopping on a life raft to save his own skin while the frustrated officer waves the boat ahead for release, even the nameless shots of the mother and her two kids with no hope of escape drowning together below decks. The sweet bravado of the string quartet. And who the hell is this guy in White who shows up at the end to help Rose up, then rides the boat down with them into the ocean? I always thought he was the wildest guy. I don't think we even get a name.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
So this happened.


What a clusterfork.

Yet another talented superhero flames out because of character issues.

It's also really sad considering he gave the most inspired performances in some lackluster phase 4+ stories.

Based on the opening left by the end of Loki s2, they will either replace him with a different black actor or shift to Dr. Doom.
 
Last edited:

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,403
So this happened.


What a clusterfork.

Yet another talented superhero flames out because of character issues.

It's also really sad considering he gave the most inspired performances in some lackluster phase 4+ stories.

After the end of Loki s2, they will either replace him with a different black actor or shift to Dr. Doom.
Im betting shift to Dr Doom, theyve been teasting FF im not optimistic
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
It's like an obit for his career.

The Fast Rise and Staggering Fall of Jonathan Majors​

After an indie-film breakout just four years ago, he was headed to the A list. But a criminal conviction immediately jeopardized his leading-man status.


 
Last edited:

Tomb1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
1,043
I liked the Killer with the Magneto guy....there was also a 2023 Korean film Ballerina that is pretty good

but my favorite revenge of all time is Point Blank from 1960s...I think this dialogue and the way the actors delivered it just amounted to pure gold:

  • Brewster : You're a very bad man, Walker, a very destructive man! Why do you run around doing things like this?
    Walker : I want my money. I want my $93,000.
    Brewster : $93,000? You threaten a financial structure like this for $93,000? No, Walker, I don't believe you. What do you really want?
    Walker : I - I really want my money.
    Brewster : Well, I'm not going to give you any money and nobody else is. Don't you understand that?
    Walker : Who runs things?
    Brewster : Carter and I run things. I run things.
    Walker : What about Fairfax? Will he pay me?
    Brewster : Fairfax is a man who signs checks.
    Walker : No, cash.
    Brewster : Fairfax isn't going to give you anything. He's finished. Fairfax is dead. He just doesn't know it yet.
    Walker : Somebody's got to pay.
  • Brewster : Let me tell you something about corporations, Walker. This is a corporation. I'm an officer in a corporation. We deal in millions. We never see cash! I got about eleven dollars in my pocket.

  • https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062138/characters/nm0005279


 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,160
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Rebel Moon P1 is kind of a hot mess and feels way underwritten in spots (or non-sensibly written) + missing character arc and back story material. The rated R "extended cut" will supposedly have another whole hour of material, it just seems unfair to ask viewers to watch an obviously amputated film at all vs just giving them an option at the same time to watch either -- but this cut will not release until potentially after Part 2 (non-extended) in April.

RM feels underwhelming at times, and really it's less a Star Wars scope story and more of a Seven Samurai scope story -- Sofia Boutella's Kora is really an exiled hero with connections to the throne usurper whose simple faming life is threatened and thus tries to assemble a small collection of other misfits and dissidents in order to protect it. It's not really clear how (by tying it into the empire level insurgency) they would win at all, considering the villainous army can just bombard the village's location and obliterate it, but okay whatever.

The script suffers from this kind of lack of thought and even an understanding how an empire needing food (do they really need grain to make their food, if they have their huge starships?) would try to have a small village of 50 people supply said food or would handle acquiring their own food vs actually having an entire logistical setup to collect and move food from other locations to a centralized one to distribute in-house to their own troops -- it's just kind of stupid and bizarre -- but that's how they decide to bring Kora out of retirement, along with the true and tried trope of putting a young female villager in peril of losing her innocence by a terribly inhuman garrison. The dialogue itself is not quite "Jupiter Ascending" levels of inane, but at times it doesn't place a ton higher.

The allusions to this film swiping from multiple sources is very true. We see allusions to many things aside from Seven Samurai -- it shamelessly hits up films like Gladiator, Game of Thrones, Avengers: Infinity War, John Carter of Mars, Star Wars cantina and Sith sequences, I could probably find a few more in there to comment on -- so it almost becomes a drinking game in trying to call them all as you go.

The main strength of RM is simply the visuals, which are often gorgeous (even if inane as well at some spots), and the film does pick up a bit as it moves forward, adding a new eclectic cast of rebels and misfits to the cast. Despite the underwritten parts, the main actors can carry their roles forward. Ray Fisher is actually one of the standouts, he's rather inspiring and commanding in his time on screen, and I wish they had spent more time on him. Michael Huisman might actually be one of the worst. I also hope they have a reason for casting Hopkins for voice acting, versus just "oh won't this be cool?" because that whole bit seems to suspend belief in the film. But again, hey -- the visuals!

I am mainly interested in seeing whether the additional hour of film actually makes this a better picture or is just full of more useless junk.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Rebel Moon P1 is kind of a hot mess and feels way underwritten in spots (or non-sensibly written) + missing character arc and back story material. The rated R "extended cut" will supposedly have another whole hour of material, it just seems unfair to ask viewers to watch an obviously amputated film at all vs just giving them an option at the same time to watch either -- but this cut will not release until potentially after Part 2 (non-extended) in April.

RM feels underwhelming at times, and really it's less a Star Wars scope story and more of a Seven Samurai scope story -- Sofia Boutella's Kora is really an exiled hero with connections to the throne usurper whose simple faming life is threatened and thus tries to assemble a small collection of other misfits and dissidents in order to protect it. It's not really clear how (by tying it into the empire level insurgency) they would win at all, considering the villainous army can just bombard the village's location and obliterate it, but okay whatever.

I lost a lot of the interest I might have had in this upon learning it was Seven Samurai in space, which I've already seen done multiple times.


Also, I think I know where this story is going. Potential spoiler:
 
Top