I had a stack of films for eldest to watch (with or without me), so we ended up watching The Grey last night. I tried to give him films he wouldn't have heard of and/or hadn't seen. The Grey (directed by Joe Carnahan, although Ridley & Tony Scott were involved in the production) might be Carnahan's best film -- I know he has said it's the most satisfying one for him.
it was marketed a bit wrong, leading people to think it as an action picture where Liam Neeson punches wolves in the face a lot. Not really, but I understand the difficulty in marketing it -- how do you market a film that seems bleak at least on a superficial level and doesn't provide a tangible action payoff? This is really more in along the lines of "The Edge" -- they are both survival films that are almost more philosophical in nature, in terms of humanity's orientation towards nature and an indifferent universe.
Neeson is just amazing in this film and I can't help but think about how the tragedy that rocked his life a year before filming this impacted his performance deeply. It feels like it is tapping into the same kinds of feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, the universe's indifferent, and trying to discover or create meaning in a world devoid of it.
(This film also reminds me of "The Descent," which is a bit more horrific and unnaturally bloody, but (1) a uni-gendered group, so you see particular dynamics play out, and (2) things feel pretty bleak / no one is going to intervene to save the protagonists, and (3) the whole film, music, image, and locale, is saturated to evoke particular feelings of sadness/loss, longing, and unmet desire.)
It's got one of the most harrowing plane crashes I have ever seen in a film, srsly, helped by foreshadowing it with the signals of temp/electrical failure, and then the crash itself.
There's a number of small decent performances in the film, and I love how they are actors who MIGHT be recognizable but you probably can't quite recall their names. The two most noticeable (and who have the best parts beside Neeson) are Frank Grillo (Diaz) and Dermot Mulroney (Talget). Every survivor of the crash has their own way to view life and death, and these form the basis of their interactions and dialogue as they try to escape the wilderness, harried by wolves who seem to believe the men have encroached on their territory (so they are not willing to back off).
Meanwhile, there's the mystery of Neeson's character (Ottway), whose opening scenes seem to jar with his later behavior, and determine what his backstory is and how that has impacted his worldview.
There's a nice parallel between pack leaders (the wolves but also the men), with similar dynamics playing out -- maybe we're not so different after all. But also the film gels with where my own life experience has led me, I can identify with Ottway deeply.
There are numerous theories out there about how real the film is, or whether Ottway is imagining it, or whether it's symbolic in other ways (often tied to the word "grey"), but I tend to take it just literally, especially near the end where Ottway looks into the sky for meaning and gets no response except for what he must provide himself. It is very much an absurdist movie (why do some men die in the crash and others do not, especially if the ones who miraculous survive then die in more horrific ways later? Is this a joke? Or why is a man like Ottway in charge of keeping others alive? And so on.) and a film that acknowledges uncertainty about the meaning of the universe, and where that leaves us as people if we still need to quell that feeling of emptiness and loss.
The music is really evocative even if simple, and the sound palette / edits are really great. The film even manages to work around much of the issue with using animatronic or CG wolves by shooting the film with the necessary tricks even without the wolves present.
I know with the marketing that some are disappointed with the ending, but I don't see how it could have ended differently. If you sit through the credits, you're left with a bit more, although everything remains ambiguous. This is a case where the film is consistent with itself but expectations were improperly set by advertising.