Mbti, Function, and Enneagram Survay

[RadicalDoubt]

Hello, I am conducting a survey that you can take here.

I make a lot of assumptions in regards to how the enneagram effects mbti, stacking, and dichotomy of individual types and how individual types may vary based upon that. There's not a lot of statistics out there for the assumptions I make, hence I am testing validity of my ideas and will end up sharing them here if I get a large enough response.

You are eligable to participate if you are near 100% certain of your grant stack OR dichotomy, and enneagram core type. The test also gives options for you to provide other expressions of your type including if you follow op/fluid stacks/jungian mbti/etc, which I assume will get fewer responces than the grant stack. You are not required to know both your grant stack and dichotomy, but you should be able to provide your dichotomy. The survey allows for border types in terms of dichotomy and is interested in cases where border types situate. You are not required in this test to choose a wing if you believe your wings are balanced.

I am posting this elsewhere. If there are any questions, please ask I guess.

 

[Vendrah]

If there are any questions, please ask I guess.

I never ever truly stick to a single MBTI TBH, I guess you don't have Jung typology otherwise I could simply pick Ne type / Ne dom.

My questions is:
- I suggest you to put SLOAN on that too, even if not obligatory. You can still apply the clustering principle that I've explained X Types to nearly anything, including if you get a good bunch of responses (even though they will be biased but the type which loves taking tests is always there in one form or another, with the same tendencies regardless the system you use). Also, if you are not consider the instinctual stacking on enneagram, maybe you should, and the same for tri-type - actually, the internet does not have a tri-type to MBTI or tri-type to SLOAN table yet.
- Wanna help on posting? Which communities you are putting in? I can post this in reddit r/mbti and INFJ forum if you want me to.

EDIT: Actually, if you ran a survey more loose - asking only a person to be a 100% of the type at one thing and marking only what they are certain - a survey containing all the typing systems currently at personality-database would be great.

 

[RadicalDoubt]

I never ever truly stick to a single MBTI TBH, I guess you don't have Jung typology otherwise I could simply pick Ne type / Ne dom.

My questions is:
- I suggest you to put SLOAN on that too, even if not obligatory. You can still apply the clustering principle that I've explained X Types to nearly anything, including if you get a good bunch of responses (even though they will be biased but the type which loves taking tests is always there in one form or another, with the same tendencies regardless the system you use). Also, if you are not consider the instinctual stacking on enneagram, maybe you should, and the same for tri-type - actually, the internet does not have a tri-type to MBTI or tri-type to SLOAN table yet.
- Wanna help on posting? Which communities you are putting in? I can post this in reddit r/mbti and INFJ forum if you want me to.

EDIT: Actually, if you ran a survey more loose - asking only a person to be a 100% of the type at one thing and marking only what they are certain - a survey containing all the typing systems currently at personality-database would be great.

The test gives opportunity for you to put jung type, it's just not a required response. You are not required to give grant type if you primarily follow another theory and there's ability to put atypical stack types as well if you believe that is the case for you. The survey will likely have a higher response rate on dichotomy than grant stack (which is similar enough to SLOAN, except I don't care about the neuroticism status here, hence it's literally just I vs E vs etc with allowance for border types). You can take it as long as you have a dichotomy (which for you is xNxP right?).

I have similar things with some socionics things but I figured I'd hold off because I don't know enough socionics people... You can post this in areas where you assume there would be a high amount of people who correctly typed themselves (or are aware when they are not certain of their type). I would not trust the INFJ forum, for example, but I posted on a reputable enough discord server for example. Redit might be useful though. I don't think many people have responded, but I can probably add sloan

Edit: I added sloan

 

[Vendrah]

I would not trust the INFJ forum, for example, but I posted on a reputable enough discord server for example. Redit might be useful though

So should I post on reddit or not? Because, you know, finding a place where people are so sure of their type is actually a hard thing.

 

[RadicalDoubt]

So should I post on reddit or not? Because, you know, finding a place where people are so sure of their type is actually a hard thing.

I agree with the latter, I think it could be potentially valuable to post on Reddit, thank you

 

[Vendrah]

I agree with the latter, I think it could be potentially valuable to post on Reddit, thank you

Done. I will answer it later.

 

[Vendrah]

Hello, I am conducting a survey that you can take here.

I make a lot of assumptions in regards to how the enneagram effects mbti, stacking, and dichotomy of individual types and how individual types may vary based upon that. There's not a lot of statistics out there for the assumptions I make, hence I am testing validity of my ideas and will end up sharing them here if I get a large enough response.

You are eligable to participate if you are near 100% certain of your grant stack OR dichotomy, and enneagram core type. The test also gives options for you to provide other expressions of your type including if you follow op/fluid stacks/jungian mbti/etc, which I assume will get fewer responces than the grant stack. You are not required to know both your grant stack and dichotomy, but you should be able to provide your dichotomy. The survey allows for border types in terms of dichotomy and is interested in cases where border types situate. You are not required in this test to choose a wing if you believe your wings are balanced.

I am posting this elsewhere. If there are any questions, please ask I guess.

And then, what happened?

 

[RadicalDoubt]

And then, what happened?

Sorry for the late response, it's been hectic on my end. I have the data, but a very small range of data (ie. like 10 responses) that's not enough to draw any relevant conclusions