User Tag List

123 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 30

  1. #1
    #wow #whoa MovinOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    MBTI
    SiFi
    Enneagram
    641 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SLI Si
    Posts
    535

    Default Seeking TypologyCentral Opinions: MovinOut's Type Me Thread

    I’d appreciate being typed in any system. MBTI, enneagram, instinctual variants, socionics, Hogwarts houses, temperaments, anything you can throw at me. (Note: I am definitely most interested in enneagram and variants.)

    I filled out a couple of questionnaires here. I appreciate any feedback!
    (P.S. if you respond to my questionnaire and you have one up I’ll reply to yours as well in detail, just let me know.)

    I'm also willing to answer any further questions, or even questionnaires if you have any good ones. I'll probably ask follow-up questions if I get some sort of interesting type suggestion.

    RadicalDoubt Questionnaire



    Mayflower Questionnaire


  2. #2
    ιяяєѕιѕтιвlє Ꮆяαѕρ Luminous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    MBTI
    dɟu
    Enneagram
    925 sx/sp
    Posts
    8,728

    Default

    Could you please make a collage of images that you are drawn to? (Befunky is a good site for making a collage.)
    нєισтяσριc
    Likes MovinOut liked this post

  3. #3
    ιяяєѕιѕтιвlє Ꮆяαѕρ Luminous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    MBTI
    dɟu
    Enneagram
    925 sx/sp
    Posts
    8,728

    Default

    Hmm. I think 649 for enneagram tritype. The 6 and 4 come across very strongly. I don't think you're a 4 core - you've got more of a 6's desire to be connected to others rather than a 4's pride of feeling an alien. I don't think you're triple reactive, and you seem quite withdrawn, so 9 fits better than 8 or 1, I think. I'm thinking probably sx/sp rather than sp/sx, but I am going to think about that and might come back with a different opinion. 6 is a complicated type. From what you describe, it sounds like sx is dominant. Passion is highly important to you. Sp matters are also important, but it's more the vehicle that allows you to pursue sx.

    @RadicalDoubt has an excellent grasp of type 6, so I do hope she'll post her opinion.
    нєισтяσριc
    Likes MovinOut liked this post

  4. #4
    Inactive For A Bit RadicalDoubt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    MBTI
    SiTi
    Enneagram
    9w1 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    1,218

    Default

    I agree with Luminous on this one, 649. The 9 fix didn't really show as much here as it has in more interpersonal reactions (ie. discord), however, I've always considered you a likely candidate for a double withdrawn type. Double reactive (especially with two reactive types in the lead) is almost always fairly aggressive and outward with their anger, especially with sx and soc blindness in the picture. You seem somewhat resigned and controlled in comparison to 1 or 8 fixers (and if you didn't have a 9 fix, I think it would be a 1 fix; You seem to carry the influences of the idealistic triad for sure).

    4 vs 6 has always been a sort of tough call for you, but I'm still partial to 6 core (though I will note that I don't get a strong read on your wing here, nor have I ever really; I wonder if it could be 7 in an idealistic triad sort of way, then again you are pretty withdrawn so I'm unsure). Like above mentioned, you seem to have a desire for connection to others and for a sense of belonging despite thinking you will not find such a thing. A recall back on discord your shame orientation seemed to have a superego flair to it, and some of what you mention in the second question of my questionnaire (ie. the way you describe envy) sounds somewhat reminiscent of 3 disintegration.

    I still have no clue on your mbti type. Something tells me you're Si sx (since I tend to have trouble identifying Si when sx is in the picture), but when you typed ISxP I had no issue with that, though you come across like a Fi user to me in interaction.
    Likes Luminous, MovinOut liked this post

  5. #5
    #wow #whoa MovinOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    MBTI
    SiFi
    Enneagram
    641 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SLI Si
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luminous View Post
    Could you please make a collage of images that you are drawn to? (Befunky is a good site for making a collage.)
    Sure! I've made a ton in the past that I think are accurate to what I am drawn to. I will have to dig them up and send my favorites to you! I might also make a new one as well.
    Likes Luminous liked this post

  6. #6
    #wow #whoa MovinOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    MBTI
    SiFi
    Enneagram
    641 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SLI Si
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luminous View Post
    Hmm. I think 649 for enneagram tritype. The 6 and 4 come across very strongly. I don't think you're a 4 core - you've got more of a 6's desire to be connected to others rather than a 4's pride of feeling an alien. I don't think you're triple reactive, and you seem quite withdrawn, so 9 fits better than 8 or 1, I think. I'm thinking probably sx/sp rather than sp/sx, but I am going to think about that and might come back with a different opinion. 6 is a complicated type. From what you describe, it sounds like sx is dominant. Passion is highly important to you. Sp matters are also important, but it's more the vehicle that allows you to pursue sx.
    Yes, 4 and 6 have consistently been the two types I've related most to. I've had difficulty figuring out which would be my core. I can definitely see 6, for that reason. It surely is a complicated type, and it seems to manifest differently in so many people. Do you have an idea for the wing?

    9 as my gut type seems to be what people usually think I am. I've had a hard time seeing it on its own, since I don't relate much to the core fear/desire, nor most descriptions of it. Can I be a 9 fix if I don't relate to it? Or maybe I do but don't realize it? But I guess it would manifest differently with 4 and 6 first.

    And THANK YOU so much for the feedback regarding variants. I've been I think you may be right about me being sx/sp rather than sp/sx due to sp being in service to the sx desire for passion. If you do think more about it, please let me know. As an sx/sp, I'm sure you know a lot about this stacking.
    Likes Luminous liked this post

  7. #7
    #wow #whoa MovinOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    MBTI
    SiFi
    Enneagram
    641 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SLI Si
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalDoubt View Post
    I agree with Luminous on this one, 649. The 9 fix didn't really show as much here as it has in more interpersonal reactions (ie. discord), however, I've always considered you a likely candidate for a double withdrawn type. Double reactive (especially with two reactive types in the lead) is almost always fairly aggressive and outward with their anger, especially with sx and soc blindness in the picture. You seem somewhat resigned and controlled in comparison to 1 or 8 fixers (and if you didn't have a 9 fix, I think it would be a 1 fix; You seem to carry the influences of the idealistic triad for sure).
    Yeah, I've considered a 1 fix before (you might have been around when I did). I just think that the core fears/desires fit so much better for me than 9, especially with its connection to frustration, but I guess the way I deal with anger can appear to be more 9-ish especially since I am withdrawn. It's kind of a tough call. I think the 469 tritype fits better than 146 though.

    4 vs 6 has always been a sort of tough call for you, but I'm still partial to 6 core (though I will note that I don't get a strong read on your wing here, nor have I ever really; I wonder if it could be 7 in an idealistic triad sort of way, then again you are pretty withdrawn so I'm unsure). Like above mentioned, you seem to have a desire for connection to others and for a sense of belonging despite thinking you will not find such a thing. A recall back on discord your shame orientation seemed to have a superego flair to it, and some of what you mention in the second question of my questionnaire (ie. the way you describe envy) sounds somewhat reminiscent of 3 disintegration.
    Actually, a main reason why I typed as 4 is because I thought I had a strong connection to 3 (via the wing and being a similar image type). I never thought about the possibility of 3 disintegration. That's a good point.

    In terms of 6, the wing is hard for me to figure out. 6w5 descriptions are more fitting but I agree that I do feel connected to the type 7 idealistic triad.

    What does a superego flair to shame orientation mean?

    I still have no clue on your mbti type. Something tells me you're Si sx (since I tend to have trouble identifying Si when sx is in the picture), but when you typed ISxP I had no issue with that, though you come across like a Fi user to me in interaction.
    MBTI is strange to me. I think both Si and Fi+Se would seem similar and relevant to the way I interact with the environment. I think I relate more to Si so I've wondered if I could be a Si-dom. I don't know. I agree that Si sx would be unconventional.
    Likes Luminous liked this post

  8. #8
    ιяяєѕιѕтιвlє Ꮆяαѕρ Luminous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    MBTI
    dɟu
    Enneagram
    925 sx/sp
    Posts
    8,728

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MovinOut View Post
    Yes, 4 and 6 have consistently been the two types I've related most to. I've had difficulty figuring out which would be my core. I can definitely see 6, for that reason. It surely is a complicated type, and it seems to manifest differently in so many people. Do you have an idea for the wing?

    9 as my gut type seems to be what people usually think I am. I've had a hard time seeing it on its own, since I don't relate much to the core fear/desire, nor most descriptions of it. Can I be a 9 fix if I don't relate to it? Or maybe I do but don't realize it? But I guess it would manifest differently with 4 and 6 first.

    And THANK YOU so much for the feedback regarding variants. I've been I think you may be right about me being sx/sp rather than sp/sx due to sp being in service to the sx desire for passion. If you do think more about it, please let me know. As an sx/sp, I'm sure you know a lot about this stacking.
    I would guess 6w5, however, I'm not as practiced in wings.

    If 9 were last in your tritype, it would make sense for you to not identify with it as much. Also many enneagram descriptions are overly simplistic and if you are sx/sp, that can put something of a different take on 9 (sx/sp itself can look 4ish). 9s aren't always doormats, they're not always peaceful, they have worries and deep emotions. They are in some ways more sensitive than other types because they are so affected by environment - they are about maintaining an internal level despite whatever the world is doing around them. Sometimes that's easy; sometimes it's impossible. I hope that helped. If you are 64x and sx/sp, there's a lot of nonstereotypical 9 qualities that are going to show up. The reason I said 9 and not 1 is because 1s are about assertive action, especially 1sx.
    нєισтяσριc

  9. #9
    Inactive For A Bit RadicalDoubt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    MBTI
    SiTi
    Enneagram
    9w1 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    1,218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MovinOut View Post
    Actually, a main reason why I typed as 4 is because I thought I had a strong connection to 3 (via the wing and being a similar image type). I never thought about the possibility of 3 disintegration. That's a good point.
    It's worth noting that sx also tends to accent connection to 3 in type 6 as far as I'm aware, especially as it is connected to the counter type.

    What does a superego flair to shame orientation mean?
    What I was getting to with this is that shame seems to be accessed through the lens of a compliant type (ie. you shame seems to be tied to the insecurities of type 6), which is why I suspected disintigration could be the case.

    MBTI is strange to me. I think both Si and Fi+Se would seem similar and relevant to the way I interact with the environment. I think I relate more to Si so I've wondered if I could be a Si-dom. I don't know. I agree that Si sx would be unconventional.
    I could actually see ISTJ fitting pretty decently for you. If not, maybe ISFP.

  10. #10
    #wow #whoa MovinOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    MBTI
    SiFi
    Enneagram
    641 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SLI Si
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luminous View Post
    I would guess 6w5, however, I'm not as practiced in wings.

    If 9 were last in your tritype, it would make sense for you to not identify with it as much. Also many enneagram descriptions are overly simplistic and if you are sx/sp, that can put something of a different take on 9 (sx/sp itself can look 4ish). 9s aren't always doormats, they're not always peaceful, they have worries and deep emotions. They are in some ways more sensitive than other types because they are so affected by environment - they are about maintaining an internal level despite whatever the world is doing around them. Sometimes that's easy; sometimes it's impossible. I hope that helped. If you are 64x and sx/sp, there's a lot of nonstereotypical 9 qualities that are going to show up. The reason I said 9 and not 1 is because 1s are about assertive action, especially 1sx.
    Oh, that's a useful description of 9. I hear about their connections to their environment but I've never been quite sure what "merging" meant in that context. It does help, thank you. And of course I do think that 6 and 4 come first so I won't be a conventional 9.

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalDoubt View Post
    It's worth noting that sx also tends to accent connection to 3 in type 6 as far as I'm aware, especially as it is connected to the counter type.
    I didn't realize that.

    What I was getting to with this is that shame seems to be accessed through the lens of a compliant type (ie. you shame seems to be tied to the insecurities of type 6), which is why I suspected disintigration could be the case.
    Okay, I get it. Thank you for asking.

    I could actually see ISTJ fitting pretty decently for you. If not, maybe ISFP.
    Yeah. I don't think I can be ISFJ because aux Fe sounds like quite a stretch for me. I've wondered if aux Te could be a stretch as well. I'll have to think about it more.
    Likes RadicalDoubt liked this post

Similar Threads

  1. MY INSTINCTUAL VARIANT, YET ANOTHER TYPE ME THREAD
    By Nicki in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-25-2015, 04:36 AM
  2. [Enne] My first Type Me thread?
    By Cimarron in forum Enneagram
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-08-2014, 01:02 AM
  3. My Type Me Thread
    By Loki Grim in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-30-2011, 02:41 AM
  4. Another Type me thread!!!
    By Curator in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 03-14-2011, 04:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO