[Other Socionics] I will VI you

[lowcal]

[MENTION=22926]boomslang[/MENTION]

Would you mind taking a moment to VI me? I am rather confused about my type at the moment.

Thanks very much!

 

[RobinSkye]

Could you evaluate based just on the two photos I already have on here?

 

[fetus]

[MENTION=22926]boomslang[/MENTION] are you still doing this?

 

[Olm the Water King]

 

[Kas]

For sure INFP.

 

[WorldSocionics]

I strongly disapprove of this thread.

Can't assume it is in jest, given how many eastern socionists really do take this sort of thing seriously.

 

[boomslang]

I strongly disapprove of this thread.

Can't assume it is in jest, given how many eastern socionists really do take this sort of thing seriously.

That's okay, I strongly disapprove of hackneyed process Ti/Fe-style wheel reinvention goofbaggery and consensus-voting based on selling your self-typing to a group of hand picked sycophants.

You stick with your thing, and I'll stick with mine.

 

[WorldSocionics]

That's okay, I strongly disapprove of hackneyed process Ti/Fe-style wheel reinvention goofbaggery and consensus-voting based on selling your self-typing to a group of hand picked sycophants.

You stick with your thing, and I'll stick with mine.

I assume you're talking about Gulenko's Humanitarian Socionics school, because otherwise you aren't up to date on how WSS operates.

 

[boomslang]

I assume you're talking about Gulenko's Humanitarian Socionics school, because otherwise you aren't up to date on how WSS operates.

Why, did you step down or something?

 

[WorldSocionics]

Why, did you step down or something?

To think that my presence is sufficient for sycophancy is giving me too much credit.

I encouraged people to join my Diagnostic Team who have no subordination to myself, but have been in Socionics before my involvement. One can hardly say that Aestrivex and Expat are sycophantic to anyone in the community. Furthermore, consensus-voting is no longer a thing for working out a person's type. The different arguments and disagreements are voiced with the reasons behind them.

Furthermore, accusations of wheel reinvention are firmly stuck to Gulenko and his Model G aspirations. There is no wheel reinvention with Socionics, merely a revolution of process and attitude towards its application and development.

 

[Jaguar]

I encouraged people to join my Diagnostic Team who have no subordination to myself, but have been in Socionics before my involvement. One can hardly say that Aestrivex and Expat are sycophantic to anyone in the community. Furthermore, consensus-voting is no longer a thing for working out a person's type.

No longer? That it ever existed to begin with is ludicrous.

 

[WorldSocionics]

No longer? That it ever existed to begin with is ludicrous.

Well consensus-voting was thought to work well in theory, in that the arguments for and against the most probable types were given and people were asked to vote based on the merits of these arguments and how they matched their experiences of the person. However, the flaws of such a process quickly made themselves apparent, including the group politics and personal stupidity. At the time there was no method of separating people who knew what they were talking about and were capable of applying critical thinking from those who either could not or had an agenda.