cascadeco
New member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 9,080
- MBTI Type
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 9w1
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Based on the pictures and elements? I have no idea.which instinct do you think most people would be drawn to?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Based on the pictures and elements? I have no idea.which instinct do you think most people would be drawn to?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Based on the pictures and elements? I have no idea.
whoops sorry cascade. I have to remember that things that are obvious to me are rarely obvious to others haha. I mean...a pig...a chicken and a snake? These are the mascots here? We've got two farm animals that we primary encounter on our table when we are eating them... and a snake...an animal with centuries of "love/hate" mystic from fables to the bible...strong enough to challenge god...etc. etc. as well as being a phallic symbol...
Well right, I mean I did pick up on that, but I was more thinking....well, second-guessing and then contemplating about the fact that I can't stand many of the 'hip' trends in the current culture,or any time period really, I suppose, so was internally laughing at the fact that maybe 85% of ppl *would* really like the pig, or something...I mean my personal taste is NO indication of anything hahaha
^^Totally. Still knowing you...I know that if you were in charge of selecting the animals to represent the instincts you would have an awareness of how weirdly unbalanced that looks and choose 3 animals on the same level. Like...I think bear would be perfect for self-preservation (if animals are somehow a necessity here wtf?)
So the way I understand the instincts is these are 3 instincts that insured our survival that we still use in varying amounts today. They are equal in strength...survivability. But people's biases lead them to create the pig, chicken and snake thing.
^^Totally. Still knowing you...I know that if you were in charge of selecting the animals to represent the instincts you would have an awareness of how weirdly unbalanced that looks and choose 3 animals on the same level. Like...I think bear would be perfect for self-preservation (if animals are somehow a necessity here wtf?)
So the way I understand the instincts is these are 3 instincts that ensured our survival that we still use in varying amounts today. They are equal in strength...survivability. But people's biases lead them to create the pig, chicken and snake thing.
Yah, got it, and yes I think I could come up with a better representative for them, or for all. Bear, or possibly cat (Snow Leopard?), would be good for sp (many cat species in the wild might live virtually solitary lives outside of mating). Otter or dolphin maybe for so-. Or elephant.
Snow leopard sounds cool although I don't really know what they do. I'm just thinking of some animal that has earned human respect because we see them as both intelligent and powerful...that stores food away for winter. And totally dolphins...or dude...wolves man for social....when they hunt they are like a machine...each wolf knows exactly what they are doing...
Come to think of it, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the people mistyping as INFJs come to that point because of animal archetypes on pop typology sites.
Understanding the Myers Briggs Type Indicator: Myers Briggs Personality Types as Animals
who the fuck wants to identify as a deer, beaver, hippo, etc?
If that's the case, I've lost all interest in humanity.
Come to think of it, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the people mistyping as INFJs come to that point because of animal archetypes on pop typology sites.
Understanding the Myers Briggs Type Indicator: Myers Briggs Personality Types as Animals
who the fuck wants to identify as a deer, beaver, hippo, etc?
Wow, someone said it. Most people look at the actual presentation and go 'lmao no I'm not a beaver' than actually looking at the type, let alone theory.
Those sort of clickbaity articles are pretty obviously aimed at uninformed or uninterested people who aren't going to spend a ton of time reading it before they go back to their facebook feeds to scroll to the next click bait and fake news links in their feeds. I hate to sound elitist like that, but I think it's that sort of cutesy trivialization of Jungian typology that leads to or exacerbates a lot the misconceptions that MBTI is little more than a parlour game with no basis in science.
Those sort of clickbaity articles are pretty obviously aimed at uninformed or uninterested people who aren't going to spend a ton of time reading it before they go back to their facebook feeds to scroll to the next click bait and fake news links in their feeds. I hate to sound elitist like that, but I think it's that sort of cutesy trivialization of Jungian typology that leads to or exacerbates a lot the misconceptions that MBTI is little more than a parlour game with no basis in science. I wouldn't be surprised if that Adam Ruins Everything video was made based more on impressions of those sorts of articles than it was on any extensive research into Jungian typology.
Anyway, I was just sorta riffing on a conversation other members were having about animal archetypes and instinctual variants, but it's a general trend in pop typology that has been irking me. I apologize for digressing with my rant.
which instinct do you think most people would be drawn to?
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have everything starry, why am I still so neurotic? Medicine doesn’t help.
Much bias by the artist? The sx symbol is a snake piercing through a circle. Sperm/egg symbolism cranked to 100. Can’t get more suggestive than that.
which instinct do you think most people would be drawn to?
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not drawn to any of the images.