wolfy
awsm
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2008
- Messages
- 12,251
well n's can be just as immature and reckless as anyone else.
No way! ... Really?
well n's can be just as immature and reckless as anyone else.
well n's can be just as immature and reckless as anyone else.
I'm not talking about maturity, I'm talking about understanding and recognizing cause and effect relationships. my mistakes as a child were all from lack of discipline and restraint. if I did something wrong, I knew what I was getting into but chose to do it anyway![]()
I'm not talking about maturity, I'm talking about understanding and recognizing cause and effect relationships. my mistakes as a child were all from lack of discipline and restraint. if I did something wrong, I knew what I was getting into but chose to do it anyway![]()
I'm not talking about maturity, I'm talking about understanding and recognizing cause and effect relationships. my mistakes as a child were all from lack of discipline and restraint. if I did something wrong, I knew what I was getting into but chose to do it anyway![]()
What were your predictions about the "effect" of posting stuff like that? I realize it's cheating now since you've had a few responses. But if you were to be honest, what replies were you expecting? Just curious.I'm not talking about maturity, I'm talking about understanding and recognizing cause and effect relationships. my mistakes as a child were all from lack of discipline and restraint. if I did something wrong, I knew what I was getting into but chose to do it anyway![]()
essentially you hate my more dogmatic Fi coupled with my sometimes ruthless, yet often ill informed Te
So what you are saying is that N types have a better grasp of cause and effect and develop it at an earlier age than S types?
What were your predictions about the "effect" of posting stuff like that? I realize it's cheating now since you've had a few responses. But if you were to be honest, what replies were you expecting? Just curious.
So in other words you posted "the world is this way but I'm not going to offer an explanation or rationale, but correct me if I'm wrong" fully knowing that nobody would agree with you?
Mind if I ask.....why?
basically, yes. it's fine if you disagree
ENFP, maybe iNFP. You're like the slightly more extraverted version of [MENTION=13648]Meek[/MENTION]. You have that classic, FiSi tendency to throw around these tangential, highly personal history anecdotes whenever you're trying to make a point and I don't really notice a lot of Se-Ni at all.
Of course I disagree. But point out why you reckon it might be that way.
Interesting... though I saw a bunch of people on PersN call Meek an ISFP.
Hmmm.
A lot of that is N bias, because Meek is stupid. It's the same reason people want to type Elfboy as S, so they can disassociate themselves and they think "there's no way an N can be this ridiculous."
Ni and Ne deal with reading between the lines and recognizing the implicit consequences of one's actions. so logically wouldn't this mean that N children would be better and knowing the consequences of their actions at an earlier age?
You assume they always read correctly. The result of this is Ns tend to be more prone to perceptual delusion.
![]()