What's your Socionics type?

[Morpeko]

I think I'm pretty clearly SLI. Socionics Si fits me exceedingly well, and so does Delta. I don't care much for socionics subtypes but I think SLI-Si works well. I've had confusion in other systems but I am confident in this being my type.

 

[Opal Star]

LxE, leaning towards LSE. Definitely Ni or Si subtype (depending on whether I am LSE or LIE), because I am not as “hard” as the Te subtypes tend to appear to be. Te base fits me well.

 

[K..]

What's the contrast between MBTI and Socionics? I am an INTJ on MBTI, and for Socionics, I am an ILI with no discernible subtype.

 

[Pessimistic Hippie]

I'm settled on ESI right now, Fi subtype.

 

[Morpeko]

I think I'm pretty clearly SLI. Socionics Si fits me exceedingly well, and so does Delta. I don't care much for socionics subtypes but I think SLI-Si works well. I've had confusion in other systems but I am confident in this being my type.

I don't even know anymore. I'm not sure how I was this confident about SLI in the past. I could potentially be an ILI or ESI.

 

[fatgurl]

People have typed me as SEI, I previously thought I was LII. I always test as LII with EII coming in second. It never felt quite right so I asked people and there was SEI.

Sei fits me pretty well actually, better than a lot of personality-type stuff. I love socionics descriptions of the functions more so than mbti. Subtype, I'm not sure about. I relate most to si but there are some fe things that I also relate to.

 

[Kanra Jest]

LII/ILE?

I've gotten typed LIE Ni and while I resonated due to my extreme focus and ambitiousness with the things I am passionate about (I only do that with what I enjoy though, outside of that I'm pretty slacky) I don't know if I'm actually that type cuz the ones I mostly resonate with are INTj-Ne and ENTp-Ne when I read the descriptions they're basically spot on to me.

Either LII-Ne or ILE-Ne cuz the high focus on ideas and possibilities, data, imagination, debater, chill demeanor, but can also be detached at times,, ect

Idk which one. I'm wondering which one. Hmm.

Maybe I'll flip a coin.

Anyone have a coin?

 

[Kaneda]

SLI-Te-C.

 

[Mind Maverick]

100% convinced of ESI now. Took me a while to see it because of the way Fi/Ethics types are stereotyped/misunderstood. All this time, I was simply perceiving Fi dynamics as what makes the most logical sense. I never related to following the heart over the head, nor weighing out judgments according to “muh feelz sed so.” Just isn't me.

Jung always described feeling functioning as rational. That's never made sense to me until now. People are mistaking F for being led by emotions. That was never how Jung meant for it to be interpreted. MBTI got his work wrong.

 

[CertainlySkeptic]

Kinda settling on ILE, no subtype.

I don't think an ILE doesn't have a subtype makes any sense, since the concept of subtype is more accentuated than being an additional scheme. Otherwise, ILE-Ne works if you were to say that you relate both subtypes, since in general, it only describes a type but in their accentuation of contact/inert elemental values.

 

[CertainlySkeptic]

ILI-Te-NH