There is no equivalence between belief in God and belief in good or evil, it would like saying the temperature of water has some baring upon decisions about right and wrong.
It doesnt.
Can you explain to me how the subjectivism or relativism which you describe is not a dictionary definition of amoralism? You can pull up some dictionary definitions and wiki if you like, I can wait.
BTW I think we really should cut to the chase, if you want to claim that racial or group status has an exclusive and exclusionary subjective morality, therefore the races and other outgroups deemed to be inhuman by the master race have not moral rationale recourse or purchase upon said group go ahead. I just think or a non-racial version of Uber Mensch and Unter Mensch is so much adolescent drivel.
Its good for nothing in the adult world of work, home and leisure. Great in the gamer caves and dungeons where pissed off unpopular kids gather to nurse their grudges and all but who's got time for that?
I double dare you to tell me about a day in the life of adhering to your own, splendidly unique, entirely subjective code of ethics as it makes about as much sense as deciding you are going to speak your own invented language, everyone who has half a brain will respond to you as having done nothing of any worth and you'll sound like your spouting gibberish. And if you live by an entirely subjective code, which just so happens to mirror the law of the land and convention, then I call bullshit on it being anything other than a butt hurt fail at individual expressiveness, not a code of ethics at all.
If you continue to be rude, I won't reply to you anymore. I was just sharing my belief on a question you asked. You inquired further, and now are trying to claim I am making a statement on racism? Really? I am trying to explain what I believe. You really have a bad habit of ironically dehumanizing me. Don't paint people into such cartoonish caricatures.
Taken from wiki:
"Amorality is an absence of, indifference towards, or disregard for morality.[1][2][3] Some simply refer to it as a case of not being moral or immoral.[4] Amoral should not be confused with immoral, which refers to an agent doing or thinking something they know or believe to be wrong.[5]"
Amoralism disreguards morality all together. I do not disregard morality, I accept it as a natural occurance in social animal, myself included. This doesnt make good or evil objectively exist. Morality itself all revolves around the social instinct, and combined with our higher intellect as humans. Its becomes complex to the point of contradiction and paradox. It is how our ancestors evolved to work together, and survive. But evolution demands competition, or things stagnate and die out. So you can argue that social darwinism/natural selection does exist. Which is just a fancy word for some ideas and beliefs become more prevelant than others. Evolution does not favor the best, or the smartest. It favors the adaptable. Tribalism exists, because of social darwinism/natural selection. And the fact human society has become too big to support a single social group.
My philosophy is incredibly benign, and becomes a position of observance. This does not mean I do not partake in moral social actions, or do not enjoy the concept of good and evil. It just means I have learned to step outside, and observe human nature and how it affects society. It is neither harmful or helpful to anyone outside of myself.
- - - Updated - - -
BTW Stoicism, and the naturalistic component of the same, do, definitely, posit an objective standard of ethics, norms, mores and morality.
That sort of tradition is precisely the opposite of subjectivism and relativism, though you can check that out yourself I'm sure.
Nothing is objective. All things we experience are 2nd hand, and can be decieved.
