Not sure if this would work though, but here:
1. What I understand as "sensory" information = the physical world in its entirety that surrounds me. Not just smells, sensations, or pleasures, but also verbal/auditory information and animation (movements of people, objects, animals) the force and speed with which those movements happen, and how they collide and/or impact each other.
How I process "sensory" information = I observe with caution and interest, and then try to identify "universal" patterns within which all that "sensory" information can be placed. For example, if I see two people arguing, I can associate it to the scene of two physical objects colliding. And the volume of their voice and the strength of their emotions during the argument, can relate to the physical force with which the two objects collide and the collateral damage they create.
My brain always seeks to find a "simplified" universal representation of every physical phenomenon that may seem complex on first sight. Another example would be of a girl stalking her crush, or a dog running around its master - by me being associated to a moon circling its host planet. Because for me, emotions/obsessions/thoughts that cause us to follow or to "orbit" someone, can be easily associated to gravitational pulls of space bodies. These phenomenons are different in their inner-workings, but the "general" and "overall" concept is the same to me.
2. What I understand as "thought" information = the ability, process, and product of taking all of the other information that exists in the world (sensory/emotional/intuitive) and transforming it into a verbally-conveyable and store-able message, by means of a conveyable language, be that language literal or numerical, or even physical. In order for it to be conveyable, it has to be consistent, harmonious and logical, otherwise it would be impossible for it to be conveyed.
How I process "thought" information = my mind is like an asymmetrical bookshelf (refer to picture provided below). At first glance you might think that everything is in it's proper place, but in reality, every shelf is interconnected. There are borders between different fields of knowledge, but at the same time, there really aren't any. Unrelated subjects seem to be strongly interwoven and mutually support each other, creating one large strong structure.
I try to rationalize every single bit of information I receive either from the outside world or from my introspection, and place it (probably) into a "web of reason & knowledge".
The larger and stronger is that web, the more reliably I stand on it through life.
3. What I understand as "intuitive" information = a realm of interwoven knowledge and reason that exists "outside of time" .... and the instinctual ability to be aware of the existence of that "timeless" knowledge, without consciously reaching it. It's kind of like having the ability "to be aware" of universal "patterns" and "cores/origins", without having reached them consciously/logically.
Example of patterns and cores: I know that situation A will lead to X result. And I know that a collection of patterns in conjunction, will lead to a certain result as well. I know that each object/person/phenomenon has some kind of "essential" nature, some basic core "seed", that appeared during his/its creation, and drives it/him through life. Hence to fully understand/predict/rationalize an object or a person, you need to reach deep for their essential core, rather than basing your opinion/predictions of them based on the outside information they project.
How I process "intuitive" information = just because I am "aware" of universal patterns and cores/origins, doesn't mean that they are instantly within my grasp. I always "feel" them, as in, I always feel that everything follows some universal timeless pattern, and that everything has a core/seed programmed into it that drives its existence and actions. But figuring out those patterns and the nature of those cores in bigger details takes a lot of time and introspection, and some of that effort can be completely unintelligible but at the same time still manage to make sense to the person introspecting.
I couldn't find a good picture, so here's a bad one:
Fat dots = cores/seeds of all existences (phenomenons, persons, objects, animals).
Gird lines = the patterns that interconnect/relate to those cores/seeds, and which follow them whoever they go.
4. What I understand as "feelings" information = a set of principles that "actualize" a person's approach to life and his evaluations of himself and others. For example, a person cannot force himself to commit an ignoble deed, because he knows himself to be noble. Doing something that goes against the "actualization" of his true nature, is akin to an act of mental masochism. Or a person who cannot stay in debt for too long, because being indebted to someone makes him feel vulnerable or "incomplete", hence he will pursue to pay his debts as quickly as possible, or to avoid owing debts in the first place.
How I process "feelings" information = I feel that I can feel happy and complete in life, only if I fully "actualize" my true self. But it's very difficult to identify what my "true self" really is. I tend to devote all of my sensory/thinking/intuitive resources to identify what are the values and principles that make me - "me". (or, to identify what is the "seed" of my moral and animate essence)
As I sense that knowing this information, being fully conscious of it, is essential for survival. So far I've managed to make some progress towards identifying my core values, and identifying what should be my "natural" relationship to myself and to life. And that progress yielded that I should be more aggressive, more confrontational, more confident, more individualistic... but in a mature, calm, calculated and stable manner.
1. What I understand as "sensory" information = the physical world in its entirety that surrounds me. Not just smells, sensations, or pleasures, but also verbal/auditory information and animation (movements of people, objects, animals) the force and speed with which those movements happen, and how they collide and/or impact each other.
How I process "sensory" information = I observe with caution and interest, and then try to identify "universal" patterns within which all that "sensory" information can be placed. For example, if I see two people arguing, I can associate it to the scene of two physical objects colliding. And the volume of their voice and the strength of their emotions during the argument, can relate to the physical force with which the two objects collide and the collateral damage they create.
My brain always seeks to find a "simplified" universal representation of every physical phenomenon that may seem complex on first sight. Another example would be of a girl stalking her crush, or a dog running around its master - by me being associated to a moon circling its host planet. Because for me, emotions/obsessions/thoughts that cause us to follow or to "orbit" someone, can be easily associated to gravitational pulls of space bodies. These phenomenons are different in their inner-workings, but the "general" and "overall" concept is the same to me.
2. What I understand as "thought" information = the ability, process, and product of taking all of the other information that exists in the world (sensory/emotional/intuitive) and transforming it into a verbally-conveyable and store-able message, by means of a conveyable language, be that language literal or numerical, or even physical. In order for it to be conveyable, it has to be consistent, harmonious and logical, otherwise it would be impossible for it to be conveyed.
How I process "thought" information = my mind is like an asymmetrical bookshelf (refer to picture provided below). At first glance you might think that everything is in it's proper place, but in reality, every shelf is interconnected. There are borders between different fields of knowledge, but at the same time, there really aren't any. Unrelated subjects seem to be strongly interwoven and mutually support each other, creating one large strong structure.
I try to rationalize every single bit of information I receive either from the outside world or from my introspection, and place it (probably) into a "web of reason & knowledge".
The larger and stronger is that web, the more reliably I stand on it through life.
3. What I understand as "intuitive" information = a realm of interwoven knowledge and reason that exists "outside of time" .... and the instinctual ability to be aware of the existence of that "timeless" knowledge, without consciously reaching it. It's kind of like having the ability "to be aware" of universal "patterns" and "cores/origins", without having reached them consciously/logically.
Example of patterns and cores: I know that situation A will lead to X result. And I know that a collection of patterns in conjunction, will lead to a certain result as well. I know that each object/person/phenomenon has some kind of "essential" nature, some basic core "seed", that appeared during his/its creation, and drives it/him through life. Hence to fully understand/predict/rationalize an object or a person, you need to reach deep for their essential core, rather than basing your opinion/predictions of them based on the outside information they project.
How I process "intuitive" information = just because I am "aware" of universal patterns and cores/origins, doesn't mean that they are instantly within my grasp. I always "feel" them, as in, I always feel that everything follows some universal timeless pattern, and that everything has a core/seed programmed into it that drives its existence and actions. But figuring out those patterns and the nature of those cores in bigger details takes a lot of time and introspection, and some of that effort can be completely unintelligible but at the same time still manage to make sense to the person introspecting.
I couldn't find a good picture, so here's a bad one:
Fat dots = cores/seeds of all existences (phenomenons, persons, objects, animals).
Gird lines = the patterns that interconnect/relate to those cores/seeds, and which follow them whoever they go.
4. What I understand as "feelings" information = a set of principles that "actualize" a person's approach to life and his evaluations of himself and others. For example, a person cannot force himself to commit an ignoble deed, because he knows himself to be noble. Doing something that goes against the "actualization" of his true nature, is akin to an act of mental masochism. Or a person who cannot stay in debt for too long, because being indebted to someone makes him feel vulnerable or "incomplete", hence he will pursue to pay his debts as quickly as possible, or to avoid owing debts in the first place.
How I process "feelings" information = I feel that I can feel happy and complete in life, only if I fully "actualize" my true self. But it's very difficult to identify what my "true self" really is. I tend to devote all of my sensory/thinking/intuitive resources to identify what are the values and principles that make me - "me". (or, to identify what is the "seed" of my moral and animate essence)
As I sense that knowing this information, being fully conscious of it, is essential for survival. So far I've managed to make some progress towards identifying my core values, and identifying what should be my "natural" relationship to myself and to life. And that progress yielded that I should be more aggressive, more confrontational, more confident, more individualistic... but in a mature, calm, calculated and stable manner.
