Ah, gotcha... that makes a lot of sense now. Yeah, I've seen both my sister and my friend start getting flustered when I ask them questions that requires a little more organization in their thoughts. My friend handles it a lot better, and knows I'm just curious. My sister may act like she's being attacked. She KNOWS I ask a lot of questions, but can't really control not getting worked up all that well. That's where that "They confuse objectivity with being blunt or one-up emotionally with others" quote comes in... she sometimes thinks she's being objective when she says something really blunt or sometimes hurtful.
Just a thought -- younger ENFPs may be led much more by their Ne and have less control over it with Fi, Te. As a result, we are pretty much following intuitive impulses. When decisions/thoughts are questioned, because Ne led us there, we are truly at a loss as to why. It's very much like knowing the answer but honestly not knowing how you got there. When faced with this lack of understanding ourselves, we can be very flustered. The flustered part sounds very familiar especially when looking back at how I would have reacted to similar questioning, especially from a sibling, ten years ago

At least for me, it was more about not knowing how I got there and being frustrated with having to backtrack and come up with justification for the thought/decision.
You can also a longer lasting response if you insult an idealistic cause that Fi believes in. However typically society calls this "passion" rather than rage. I will passionately defend a cause and I will come across verbally as very engaged and it can have an emotional component-I care very much about that cause.
Wow. This rings true for me as well. I remember years ago, being interviewed for a scholarship. I had just gone off on a passionate rant about how people in a certain area of the country didn't have proper representation which explained the conflict in the area and being told....you sound more like an activist. I kept thinking to myself, what's wrong with that? Caring about a subject does not preclude using objectivity in my work. It's Fi that led me to find out more about it...wish I could have explained that better way back then.
Wonka today I tried to cut off Fi and just be an NeTe machine of domination. It doesnt work if I have no Fi attachment. With no Fi motivation-if I do not care-then I cant take over the world and dominate it.
Yes, I think Kalach made me really think hard about this -- I agree. Fi makes the decision of where to invest befor Te does its work. If Fi isn't interested, Te will be tuning out pretty fast. I really like the image of little evil NeTe monsters taking over the world. I suggest building an army of them.
Stereotypically for ENFPs it's Fi that hones the intuition, pointing it at a subject matter. And this is further, indeed in tandem, honed by Te structures. (And Si.) Thus while someone with tertiary Te could probably focus hard and be the Te, it seems sort of reasonable to say that the dominant process, already by a lifetime of coexistence shaped into a significant partner to the Te, is in there tossing up things the Te can use.
The frequently posited "Ooo, a butterfly" effect supposedly characterising Ne doms probably gets used to good effect in Te situations. Like, focused argument isn't so much interrupted by butterflies as it is by suddenly discovered important connections, and boom, Ne is doing Te work.
Yes, very well said. You helped me hone in on this for myself. Internally, I was only seeing the Te which was dominating in discussion/thought/work . But you're absolutely right, this happens, as Ne Monster says, only after Fi has made the important initial decisions to engage or not and the level of engagement. I concur both with Fi leading and Te/Si helping to organize as well as to focus. This rings true. I hadn't considered the Si part quite as much but now, looking back I realize that I've worked on this so much. I remain, primarily a big picture person but when Fi has made a decision to invest in a person/process/idea, I work so hard to remember the little details and have gotten much better over the years at doing so. For example, I'm really good at remembering the names of family members or friends in the larger circle of people I care about (friends/SOs). I may have never met them but I'll remember small details about them that were shared. This also works for intellectual areas that I feel passionately about - the details stay, dates, names... Is this Si in action?
Such an ENFP answer. What, you mean people are worthy of respect ahead of theoretical models that describe people?! You mean possibility is more relevant to understanding than certainty?! Asserting that these things are true and governing principles of what the world really is, why, that's an ENFP Te Demand.
You caught me there. Well done! You're absolutely right - the above is Fi all the way.
It wouldn't. But Ne/Fi/Te might could maybe possibly mimic Fe. Or, it could provide some alternative that approximates what another person's Fe required of you at that time. Maybe.
How? I dunno. It's just an intuition based on my sense that using non-preferred functions is unpleasant to the point of the user feeling destabilised and untrue. (More below.)
I think you're really on to something here. I think Ne/Fi can absolutely be used to mimic Fe. I think we've talked about this in other threads some - especially those concerning sympathy/empathy. For Fi users, we may come across as using Fe (expressing sympathy and taking others feelings into account) but the way we do this most successfully is to engage empathy, to put ourselves in the shoes of the other person and let Fi feel what they may be feeling. Ne really helps with identifying all the possible feeling outcomes. As we express this empathy to the person and get more information, Te helps hone in on the option that is closest to what they are experiencing and Fi provides the balm. This is why people around us do feel understood - it doesn't happen with everyone but we're working real hard to identify what the person is experiencing.
This is not Fe though. You are right and true Fe users will not be fooled. For example, my ENFJ friends (several, I surround myself with I/ENJs) are so good at working a crowd, making large groups of people feel comfortable. They are also quick to provide sympathy to an expressed woe. For me, I work much better with smaller groups so that I can work through the above process better at an individual level. In terms of sympathy - anything I offer, in my view, that is done without the above process, feels shallow compared to what I know I can do for the person.
I grew up in an Fe heavy environment where all decisions were communal and there were many, many social events that involved large groups of family/friends where my role models (parents/grandparents) were playing the roles of host/facilitator/mediator...I learned how to do that and can but you're right, it's pretty exhausting. Fe is a shadow function. I'd much rather work at an individual level with Ne/Fi/Te.
Thank you for helping me see this with such clarity!
A pleasant and model-theoretically religious rebuttal lies in observing that even the less preferred functions have friends: the dominant and auxiliary functions help them to work.
Fair enough.
Yeah, and then Ne's keeping a watchful eye on what's going on right now, seeing what'll happen and what it means, and Te's tossing some things in about how to organise the nearby world with that information and those values in mind. I daresay an Fe user interacting with the ENFP wouldn't be consistently fooled, but they might be satisfied for a while.
Yep. My ENFJs have noticed the shyness/reluctance to engage in Fe. What seemed like Fe to them in our individual interactions is clearly identified as Ne/Fi/Te when put in a large group and they observe over time.
Rock on! It's Doc Wonk on the ENFP Crimes Committed Under the Influence of Te Commission, not me. Well, not yet anyway, but I might be because...
I'm going to call it the ENFPCCUTe except it's really not that endearing
Man, all that was so point-by-point you'd think I were using Ti.
As mentioned in the rep, based on the above and because you have been so helpful in the navel gazing exercise, I'd like to return the favor... it's Te all the way....
