I have only been able to skim this (helpful :] ) thread but I want to jump in and say some things . . . more later.
2. Telling people all the reasons why your Intuitive ideas are great, and how logical they are, and how people just don't appreciate you, and citing examples, and complaining about how controlling and narrow-minded people are when they are not receptive to your ideas.
This is inferior Te throwing Fi overboard and supporting out-of-control Ne.
People with dominant and secondary Te are generally quite adept at organizing the environment to suit reasonable goals.
Inferior Te in ENFPs only thinks it does that well.
ENFPs are better off establishing their own core values, than trying to establish favorable external conditions.
she sometimes thinks she's being objective when she says something really blunt or sometimes hurtful.
Language, apparent confidence, perceiving nature:
Wonka's quote describes what I have done with my streamlining thread. I enjoy writing in a very precise and analytical manner, and I can see how I can come off much more serious than I actually am. I suggested specific changes because I wanted to prompt discussion, not because I was totally sold on a new layout. I tried to communicate this through my wording, but perhaps my overall tone overpowered that. I did have doubts that my suggested changes were an improvement, but I went ahead and posted anyways -> the discussion would make that clear. But, consistent with the above quote, I can see myself jumping from one point of 'refuge' to another, each 'refuge' being an new point of argument and area for potential improvement.
Arguments/discussions allow me to probe for inconsistencies and develop understanding. They are useful to clarify if and why something is important to me, but I have to be careful not to become reticent and stubborn. Or should I be avoiding arguing? Should I just feel instead?
My post is
here.
I have an ISTP roomate/best friend and sister and sometimes they can feel like a string of tiny transgressions against my (petty?) day-to-day Te ideals. If I bring anything up, often their response immediately addresses my concern and I am left wondering why I even brought it up
and additionally wondering now how much I have upset them. So when is it 'correct' to defend myself, or to crusade for something? When Fi says to? This seems unfocused at first glance; or should I simply trust in the consistency of Fi? I think this may be complicated additionally by Te's potential to explore Fi.
^^^yeah, act how you want. You will probably still end up making INTJ-style quips and comments
quieter people are usually harder to observe/approach
I can be miserable in casual social situations. bedtime . . . too tired to manage my post
So what happened here? I wanted to promote development and be useful, but did not have the time to 'properly' Te everything out, but I wanted post anyways, so now am left with some cute, unfocused and marginally useful post. If I had taken the time to refine the post and expand on my ideas (Te), would I have ended up with some flawed, prescriptive argument?
So why archetype of crusader, or champion (we seem to be concluding here that that these are too overbearing)? Is this descriptive or prescriptive; what does an 'ideally developed' ENFP look like, stereotypically?
Awww. 
