Julius_Van_Der_Beak
Fallen
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 22,429
- MBTI Type
- EVIL
- Enneagram
- 5w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/so
The Spartans? WTH. Truly pathetic. Crowder is such a loser.
Still, it's not clear that Democratic legislators actually want to legalize marijuana. The MORE Act, which was reintroduced last month, attracted support from just five Republicans. It is chock-full of new regulations, taxes, and spending programs that seem designed to repel even Republicans who are sympathetic to the idea that the federal government should not interfere with state marijuana policies (a position that Biden also claims to favor).
Hilarious name.
Sums up most democrat bills- MORE EVERYTHINGGGG!!! Pad that bill out with as many special interest lobbyist payoffs (Joe Biden certainly didn't get himself elected here), and also create a bunch more administrative regulatory positions with their subsequent tax dollar salaries, and pay for all of it with printed money/money that doesn't exist. Textbook Washington.
Congress new job seems to be shitting out giant omnibus spending bills for special interests anytime there's majority enough to pull it off, and not much else. In between they posture for votes to maintain power. Rinse and repeat.
I think people would have less of an issue with you if you tried addressing the main points people actually made, rather than treating everything as an opportunity to rattle off preprogrammed talking points.
It's just a tip. It's up to you whether or not you follow it. If you want to be a martyr for "free thought" (lol), that's probably what you'll end up being.
I gave advice to Jaguar, too, he didn't take it, got a month-long ban, and quit the forum.
There are no “people†here- just an ever diminishing squad of stereotypically techie leftists censoring themselves into extinction. A year from now it will just be you and 20 mods trying to think of what else there is in the world to make a “what’s your favorite X†thread about. The problem with this place isn’t me. People like me are the solution to this place- but it doesn’t seem like we want solutions here. It seems like whoever is at the switchboard is just waiting for people to stop posting so they can shut down the server and move on with their life.
There are no “people†here- just an ever diminishing borg squad of stereotypically techie leftists censoring themselves into extinction. A year from now it will just be you and 20 mods trying to think of what else there is in the world to make a “what’s your favorite X†thread about. The problem with this place isn’t me. People like me are the solution to this place- but it doesn’t seem like we want solutions here. It seems like whoever is at the switchboard is just waiting for people to stop posting so they can shut down the server and move on with their life.
Which would be my advice to you, for your own good. It’s hard to realize how inheritly toxic this place is until you enjoy some time away.
I'm not saying you have been the chief problem with this place (I'd actually say the biggest problem in the past has been overblown drama that spills into everything, factions jockeying for influence, and people just unwilling to tolerate deviance from their own personal orthodoxies), but I am suggesting ways in which you could integrate into this community, if that is truly your desire, and that it does not necessarily involve giving up your beliefs. Everyone here is familiar with right-wing talking points, you repeating them is not going to convince anyone. I'm merely suggesting that relating to people here as individuals rather than as members of a leftist Biden-worshipping authoritarian hivemind could get you better results and alienate less people. I don't think it's that crazy, if you truly feel like you want to belong here and people are ganging up on you unfairly.
If your intention, however, is to be a martyr for what you believe to be the truth because you are the "solution" to this place, than have at it, I guess.
There is no substitute for actually explaining your point of view, or where you take issue with someone else's. Much of forum discussion, especially in the politics subforum, falls short of that. That has long been part of the problem, and part of what led to closing that subforum several years ago. Absent substantive, evidence-based explanations, all one has is those superficial, jargon-ridden talking points. Or worse: ad-hominem attacks, putting words in others' mouths, and other forms of denigration, baiting, and trolling.I'm not saying you have been the chief problem with this place (I'd actually say the biggest problem in the past has been overblown drama that spills into everything, factions jockeying for influence, and people just unwilling to tolerate deviance from their own personal orthodoxies), but I am suggesting ways in which you could integrate into this community, if that is truly your desire, and that it does not necessarily involve giving up your beliefs. Everyone here is familiar with right-wing talking points, you repeating them is not going to convince anyone. I'm merely suggesting that relating to people here as individuals rather than as members of a leftist Biden-worshipping authoritarian hivemind could get you better results and alienate less people. I don't think it's that crazy, if you truly feel like you want to belong here and people are ganging up on you unfairly.
If your intention, however, is to be a martyr for what you believe to be the truth because you are the "solution" to this place, than have at it, I guess.
The solution here is obvious to anyone with constructive intentions.How’s my treatment of you been, in your opinion?
I’m uninterested in integration into any ideological collective I’m afraid, which is what this “community†has decided to center its communal ties around. Other communities I’m a part of don’t operate in this way, and those are the only ones I’m interested in being a part of. I just don’t have sufficient respect or use for ideological collectivism. It is what it is, and the forum can take it or leave it.
How’s my treatment of you been, in your opinion?
\
I can tell the difference between Republicans/conservatives who are interested in an actual exchange of opinions, and those who are not interested in understanding the point of view of people who disagree with them. I have had worthwhile and enjoyable conversations with the first, but engaging with the second is generally a waste of time. Yes, there are Democrats/liberals who are similarly closed-minded. I have run into some of those, but not nearly as many. I wonder if there is something implicit in the liberal or progressive worldview that makes them more likely to examine and consider divergent points of view, but that is pure speculation. In any case, this forum has had a good handful of members who complain that more conservative political viewpoints don't get a fair hearing, while not bothering to make an actual case for them, and rebuffing requests for explanation.IMy attitude is more that it's boring. At this point, I'm convinced I'm not going to hear anything out of you I haven't already heard 1000 times before. I've been arguing with Republicans on the internet since the days of AOL message boards (and in those days they seemed to be the majority in places like that). Trust me, none of this stuff is breaking my brain.
Other folks are less patient than me and are understandably sick of people with your mentality gleefully hastening the decline of this country, as well as in some cases making their personal lives more difficult and generally supporting measures that make things worse for them.
Other folks are less patient than me and are understandably sick of people with your mentality gleefully hastening the decline of this country, as well as in some cases making their personal lives more difficult and generally supporting measures that make things worse for them.
There is no substitute for actually explaining your point of view, or where you take issue with someone else's. Much of forum discussion, especially in the politics subforum, falls short of that. That has long been part of the problem, and part of what led to closing that subforum several years ago. Absent substantive, evidence-based explanations, all one has is those superficial, jargon-ridden talking points. Or worse: ad-hominem attacks, putting words in others' mouths, and other forms of denigration, baiting, and trolling.
The solution here is obvious to anyone with constructive intentions.
I can tell the difference between Republicans/conservatives who are interested in an actual exchange of opinions, and those who are not interested in understanding the point of view of people who disagree with them. I have had worthwhile and enjoyable conversations with the first, but engaging with the second is generally a waste of time. Yes, there are Democrats/liberals who are similarly closed-minded. I have run into some of those, but not nearly as many. I wonder if there is something implicit in the liberal or progressive worldview that makes them more likely to examine and consider divergent points of view, but that is pure speculation. In any case, this forum has had a good handful of members who complain that more conservative political viewpoints don't get a fair hearing, while not bothering to make an actual case for them, and rebuffing requests for explanation.
I can tell the difference between Republicans/conservatives who are interested in an actual exchange of opinions, and those who are not interested in understanding the point of view of people who disagree with them. I have had worthwhile and enjoyable conversations with the first, but engaging with the second is generally a waste of time. Yes, there are Democrats/liberals who are similarly closed-minded. I have run into some of those, but not nearly as many. I wonder if there is something implicit in the liberal or progressive worldview that makes them more likely to examine and consider divergent points of view, but that is pure speculation. In any case, this forum has had a good handful of members who complain that more conservative political viewpoints don't get a fair hearing, while not bothering to make an actual case for them, and rebuffing requests for explanation.