Stephen King

[Frosty]

I tried to find a thread for this but did not see one. What do you think? I think he is fairly obviously intuitive, most likely an introverted intuitive. If I had to guess, the way he is able to realistically yet multi-dimensionally develop characters, seems fairly Fi/Ne. But. Im reading the stand right now and its at a point where its pretty deep into development/exposition of the plot/characters. Seeming fairly Ne/Si. Multiple plot points being simultaneously developed- yet fairly linearly- to eventually lead up to a more... settled and focused story.

The settled and focused story thing- well- a million plot points being developed to turn into one overall idea... could be Ni. I would say that- he has fair usage of both. Maybe pointing to intuitive dominance in general?

Its also interesting because although- his books- I can feel similarities in his style between them- hes fairly philosophically bent (the long walk being one of his earlier books but one of my favorites) but... also generally pretty linear. Which. Can I supoose be Ni. But... at the same time it feels to me like Ji works from the out towards the center- and he often works from the center out. Which would kinda seem more Ji/Pe. Specifically Ji/Ne/Si.

Anyways. Looked but didnt see a thread. So I made one.

 

[hjgbujhghg]

INTJ 5w6 hands up

 

[Kingu Kurimuzon]

I am octal

 

[Lord Lavender]

Its hard to type him when Ive never even met the man in person but based on his writing I could see 5w6 with his deep thought into he subject matter and a w6 streak of paranoia.

 

[Tomb1]

King would be sp/so 5w4:

He has the signature idiosyncratic gestalt of 5w4 - an independent, detached, curious, eccentric, unconventional character type.

Mark Mothersbaugh is 5w4 so/sp:

David Lynch is 5w4 so/sx:

Note the 5w4's idiosyncratic gestalt. More examples for each here:

Stackemup Exemplars Cont. - Stackemup Enneagram

 

[neko 4]

5w4

 

[misfortuneteller]

What an interesting bloke. I'd say 5w4 INTJ.