Rick's socionics test

[Cheat1011]

Not all the types switch j/p in correlation to MBTI - all the extraverts are the same, all the introverts switch (ENFp = ENFP).

Test results
ILI - Your result
LII - These types might also be considered
IEI
EII
ILE - These types are not very likely
LIE
IEE
EIE
SLI - These types are quite unlikely
LSI
SEI
ESI
SLE - these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
SEE
ESE

 

[Asterion]

ILE Your result
LIE These types might also be considered
SLE
ILI
IEE These types are not very likely
LII
LSE
EIE
SLI These types are quite unlikely
IEI
SEE
LSI
EII these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SEI
ESI

Wow, It didn't pin me as a SEE this time! I did this test a couple times on INTPc a fair while back and got retarded results, it must have been because of this time limit thing.

 

[Into It]

Also, socionics says ENFP and ISTJ make a perfect couple, lmao. What they call perfect is horrible to me.

Socionics vouches for ENFp + ISTp. Even if you convert that into MBTI (which I maintain one can do with relative accuracy, whatever that means), we wouldn't be talking about ENFP + ISTJ. But the types really are pretty much the same...even the nicknames are almost the same.

By the way, I got SEE because of the bug and really don't know if I want to do this again. That is why I award this test 1 star, even though I kind of liked it at the time. Bug should be fixed :\.

 

[527468]

Not all the types switch j/p in correlation to MBTI - all the extraverts are the same, all the introverts switch (ENFp = ENFP).

Point, but thats only how the dichotomies are named, and the ILI is NiTe yet the INTP is TiNe. The difference is that socionics still has different function and dichotomy descriptions. So the theories don't mix, Ni ≠

for example, but I'm sure there is some kind of correlation. It's not a confident one though. You can try, but you will fail and get scorned.

In short, ILI ≠ INTP / ILI ≠ INTJ / ILI ≠ MBTI / ILI = socionics / etc.

But the types really are pretty much the same...even the nicknames are almost the same.

Not always.

 

[JuneBugGemini]

IEE Your result
EIE These types might also be considered
IEI
ILE
SEE These types are not very likely
EII
LIE
ESE
ILI These types are quite unlikely
SEI
SLE
LII
ESI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
SLI
LSI

 

[Fuulie]

IEE.

What on earth does that mean. =_=

 

[Thalassa]

IEE.

What on earth does that mean. =_=

intuitive ethical extrovert

Im one too

 

[Asterion]

IEE.

What on earth does that mean. =_=

Similar to ENFP, I wouldn't be surprised if you turn out to be an ENFP, EPs tend to struggle a bit when it comes to T/F, and you've certainly ticked that box, not to mention, that picture you drew was so full of patterns that you could easily be an intuitive dominant. However, it's not impossible to be IEE & INFP. The last E is actually Extravertim, I can't remember why though. You do seem like an INFP to me, I wouldn't place any kind of bet on this ENFP conclusion

 

[wonders]

Old thread? Anyone still doing socionics on this site?

My data:

Test results
SLE Your result
LSE These types might also be considered
ILE
SLI
SEE These types are not very likely
LIE
LSI
ESE
ILI These types are quite unlikely
IEE
SEI
LII
EIE these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
IEI
EII

 

[UniqueMixture]

Test results
LSE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
LIE
ESE
ILE These types are not very likely
SEE
EIE
IEE
LSI These types are quite unlikely
SLI
LII
ESI
ILI these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
EII
IEI

 

[Such Irony]

Your result
LII

These types might also be considered
ILI
LIE
EII
ILE

These types are not very likely
IEI
EIE
LSI
IEE

These types are quite unlikely
SLI
LSE
ESI
SLE

these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
SEE

 

[Thalassa]

SEI...and that's exactly what I type myself in Socionics.

Then:

ESI, SLI, and SEE (I previously considered this one until I realized that I am just not that forceful or Napoleanic IRL at all).

 

[OrangeAppled]

I got IEE (ENFp). I tend to test as that or IEI (INFp) or EII (INFj). This time IEI was second & EII wasn't even in the running. At this point, I've kind of given up on Socionics....it's more about behaviors & dynamics with others & none of its types quite suit me.

 

[chickpea]

Your result:
IEI
These types might also be considered:
IEE
EII
ILI

 

[garbage]

This time around,

EIE Your result

IEE These types might also be considered
EII
LIE

IEI These types are not very likely
ILE
ESE
LII

SEE These types are quite unlikely
ILI
ESI
LSE

SEI these types are extremely unlikely
SLE
LSI
SLI​

I sure did raise a ruckus in the beginning of this thread, back when I gave a shit about Socionics. EIE was the second result back then. I'm surprised at how consistent this has been

 

[Infinite Bubble]

Your result:

EII

These types might also be considered:

LII
IEI
EIE

I'm not sure about the accuracy of this. I've taken it before, and always get EII. I don't think I'm INFP (I assume that's what EII translates as). IEI-INFp is only third. Hmm.

 

[Ism]

Your result:

EIE



Shrugz.

 

[Tyrinth]

ILI Your result

IEI These types might also be considered
ILE
LII

IEE These types are not very likely
EII
SLI
LIE

SEI These types are quite unlikely
EIE
SLE
LSI

SEE these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
LSE
ESE

 

[Chaotic Harmony]

Your result
SEI

These types might also be considered
SEE
ESI
SLI

These types are not very likely
ESE
SLE
LSI
IEI

These types are quite unlikely
LSE
IEE
EII
ILI

these types are extremely unlikely
EIE
ILE
LII
LIE

If the shoe fits...

 

[/DG/]

Apparently the last time I took the test, I did it wrong. Apparently I never retook it.

No reason not to take it now!

LII Your result

LSI These types might also be considered
LIE
ILI

LSE These types are not very likely
SLI
ILE
SLE

EII These types are quite unlikely
ESI
EIE
IEI

ESE these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
IEE
SEE

Weee! I'm an N now apparently!