My mistake.
I don't buy that a stellar imitation performance is impossible for an ESTJ.
It's nigh impossible, because as a type ESTJ's really don't understand people very well. They are one of the worst types at this in fact. ENFP's on the other hand are possibly the best type for understanding other people (ENFP and INFJ are especially keen at this). If you want to do a biography type role (which really involves more than just imitation), then you want an actor that understands the character's motivations. ENFP's are great at this.
Of course not, but it helps. Going by written quotes alone can be misleading. Hearing and seeing how a person says something can often change the interpretation of the content. (I
touched on this in the Natalie Portman thread.)
Going by a single quote can be misleading. I gave several quotes because you have to look at the whole person and not just one thing. You need to look at major decisions, as well as how they typically act, and quotes of things they find important, and etc.... You have to look at the whole person, because no individual fits the type descriptions 100%, but when you look at many factors you can see which type they fit into very closely.
Yay, personal comparison!
I agree that Reese does seem softer than the ESTJs I have known, however, I think she's just well-rounded. I totally see the soccer mom potential.
But now we're only focusing on whether or not we recognize her as ESTJ. Do you positively recognize in her the ENFPs you have known? (I obviously don't.)
Yes I've known several ENFP's. Some are traditional and some are not. It depends on if the tradition fits their ideals. My pastor for example is ENFP and he carries himself like Ned Flanders, lol. He seems very traditional if you just look at how he carries himself, but when you get to know him you find many of his views are non-conformist and idealistic. You wouldn't know it just from watching him for a few minutes. You have to talk to him in a way that he lets his guard down and you talk to the inner him. Other ENFP's you can tell immediately that they are non-traditional though.
When you are dealing with an N it is harder to type them by mere appearance, because much of their world is in the form or ideas, ideals, theories, imagination, etc.... With an N it's more important to listen to what they say which is one reason that quotes are important.
The distribution of types in the acting profession may be highly skewed, but that is not an argument against a specific actor being a certain type.
It's not a complete argument, but it is evidence. You have to look at the whole picture. If 85% of factors type her like an ENFP, but only 45% of factors type her like an ESTJ, then you can say she is an ENFP. You don't just look at one aspect, but all things together.
Apparently our experiences with ENFPs and ESTJs differ greatly. The ones I know could not be mistaken for each other in interviews.
Well I would never say she is an ESTJ based on those interviews.

Just on those clips it looks to me that she is both an E and F. The other two letters have to be determined from everything else we know about her.
You didn't write anything in reply to the quote about Reese being anal about table rings - do you really know ENFPs who are like that?
Everyone has pet peeves. That includes ENFP's. Every ENFP I know has some type of pet peeve just like everyone else.
I did read the article. You can't get around the fact that Little Miss Type A was her nickname as a child, whether she identifies with it today or not. I still say that no NP child could earn that nickname.
You have to look at the reason why she has the nickname. A person might be called "Tiny" because they are really small or because they are really big. In this case she wasn't called "Little Miss Type A" because she was Type A. She was called that because she was interested in studying personality types even from an early age. This is a trait you'd associate with an NF (especially an ENFP).
I disagree that the quotes you posted are conclusively NF. In fact, I don't think they have much content for typing - unlike the table rings quote.
Well for an S details like table rings are a better indicator, but for an N quotes about what they believe are better indicator. That is because S's are more concrete and N's are more abstract. So maybe we are stuck until we can agree on whether she is S or N.

But in fairness I gave many quotes which represent how an NF views the world.