• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Random TV Show Thoughts

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp

i don’t care if BCS makes me hate Walt. Walt was based and went out like a boss. Ride or die.
Walter created his own fate and accepted it. He needs no vindication

I gotta say, I like Gus even less by s6e4 of BCS. He is harder and icier and seems far less empathetic.

.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
So I watched the first host segments and the movie is just starting, and I want to put down my immediate thoughts in case I forget them( thanks to a gummy).

The budget is definitely lower than the Netflix seasons (which probably had the highest budget of any of the iterations of MST3K (apart from possibly the movie). There is heavy use of bluescreen in place of sets; but of course, unlike the visuals of Hollywood movies, they aren't really trying to be anything but computer graphics that nonetheless have a 2d animation feel. I don't really consider that a huge deal because the show was never about that, but I do think it was more charming to have practical sets that were about as convincing as original series Star Trek.

Kinga's invention exchange here is very "meta" which amused me. I guess the show has occasionally played with meta before this is a higher intensity. Perhaps this is the gummy but it seems almost like something in this surrealist art book I just got. I just got the amusing impression that this is somehow real, which is funny because the visuals are more fake than ever (well, maybe not season 1). I think Joel Hodgson must be an ENxP; the kinds of things he tends to come up with like this seem very Ne. I'd probably go with ENFP.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I like Emily better than Jonah, I think. That rap was pretty awesome. Plus she's cute.

Although I think Jonah is starting to grow into his own thing; they've started leaning into a "nerd" thing a bit which I like.

Mike was probably my favorite host since I first saw him. The Gizmpolex and Netflix seasons definitely share more in common with Joel's style more which makes sense. Joel is a lot drier and it can take me many viewings to finally "get" the joke; whereas Mike was sarcastic and cynical. But if I want some of that, that's always what Rifftrax is for. Rifftrax usually makes me laugh harder, but the new MST3k definitely puts a smile on my face.

One thing I do appreciate is that I get more of the references. I'm not sure that it's so much that the references are less obscure than the 90s run, I think it's more that the age of the writers and performers is very close to my own. But I think a lot of them are regardless fairly obscure; there are some deep cuts into nerd stuff, much like the original series referenced things like Lord of the Rings (before the movies) and Dune. Season 1 had a lot of Asimov references which must have been because of Josh Weinstein.

It's like difference between a reference to obscure kids programming from the 90s and 80s as opposed to obscure kids stuff from the 60s and 70s.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Watched episode 2.

So Chuck's illness is actually mental illness? I don't think I've seen a show deal with that too often. That is a very easy way to endear me to Jimmy.

I guess I'm hooked.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
One of the actresses in Abre Los Ojos, I saw, was in Money Heist, which Netflix had picked up a few years back -- so i watched the opening episode today. Pretty decent. I look forward to watching the rest. It seems pretty smart and canny, as well as interweaving stories and personal narratives.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Imdb sucks.


I'd give the only episode that aired a 7 or 8/10. Feels different than MCU with tones of spider verse, very different family, decent chemistry, doesn't take itself seriously. Generally enjoyable. Better than most.

I refuse to get excited because Disney kills what it touches, but we'll see.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Started watching Killing Eve this week, finally. (Now that I guess the series is over, lol?)

It's fun. It's quirky. Jodie Comer and Sandra Oh are great. I honestly haven't watched a lot with Oh in it, aside from remembering her as usually playing an acerbic-type and very controlled character, so Eve here is really different than that. (Maybe she's done other work I didn't see, but this felt like something refreshingly different -- Eve tends to talk too much at times and plays her cards too soon, and is also a bit messy and haphazard, firing off ideas.)

I first really saw Comer in Free Guy (which she got because of this series) and then The Last Duel, and she was excellent in both, so I guess I am going backwards.

Anyway, the scripts so far have been a bit quirky, witty, and interesting to watch. The show also doesn't take itself super-seriously. It's kind of a fun romp through the detective vs killer trope.
 

Kingu Kurimuzon

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
20,940
MBTI Type
I
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Watched episode 2.

So Chuck's illness is actually mental illness? I don't think I've seen a show deal with that too often. That is a very easy way to endear me to Jimmy.

I guess I'm hooked.
You may end up liking it more than BB. I find it has an overall lighter tone but the "danger" moments with cartel type characters feel all the more dangerous as a result of the juxtaposition of the two worlds we see in this show. I think season 4 and 5 have been the highpoints so far.
 

Kingu Kurimuzon

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
20,940
MBTI Type
I
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Orville opened their new season with a pretty heavy episode, but I thought it was a good take on suicide, even if the end did sorta Search For Spock a major character. However, given the character's nature, I found their revival plausible and believable. The presentation of various views on suicide was very Trekesque, not telling the audience how to feel (even if most of the main characters were clearly invested in a particular side of the debate), but I wish they'd spent just a bit more time on the ethics of the issue. It felt glanced over because hey we gotta get in another sfx shot of our new CGI model.

this has grown from a show that was initially intended as a comedy into a strong drama in which each character's humor is allowed to show through in an organic way without detracting from or cheapening the stories. This is an apples and oranges comparison, but I think it vibes a lot like Weeds or Better Call Saul in the balancing and interlacing of humor with the somber and serious moments. My biggest criticism of TNG was how straightlaced and serious everyone was almost all of the time. Orville actually presents banter and human interactions which feel a lot more realistic than the almost conflict-free touchy feely dynamic seen on TNG and other Trek series. I don't find it implausible or unrealistic that in a space battle, there would be at least one officer making a crack that they won't be getting off duty at the normal time that day. Those real world type of moments were too far and few between in TNG, though DS9 did a decent job of humanizing things.

The bigger budget showed in the exterior sfx shots, but I hope they aren't going to spend as much time showing off the bigger budget in subsequent episodes. The relatively low budget of the first two seasons never really bothered me, so just hoping story and character development won't take a backseat to spectacle. Like, let's not make it another Kurtzman Trek clone, please god.

I do wish they'd had more Bortus moments, and for that matter more moments with the rest of the returning characters, but also in the timeline it made sense to get this particular episode out of the way early on. It otherwise would have felt jarring and made less sense to have this episode come like half way in to the season. I can't elaborate on why without spoiling more

I love the scene with the krill ambassadors at the reception.
 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Started watching Season 3 of The Umbrella Academy. Two episodes down.

  • Big strength is mainly the Directors of Photography for the season (Neville Kidd and Craig Wrobleski) -- cinematography and lighting have been the highlights of other seasons as well.
  • Vanya (Elliot Page) transitions to Viktor in Episode 2. It's handled without much fuss and appropriately, as it was set up from last season partially by Vanya discovering an interest in same-sex relationships (although now this shifts to straight attraction for someone who is changing their gender). The episode offers brief explanation without derailing the plot, and characters all manage to be respectful while still responding as individuals (i.e., warm characters show more warmth, more pragmatic characters show respect and then just move on to business), and the show doesn't get hung up on it. I'm kind of glad because I felt like he had a kind of weird wig on for awhile now, and he looks more natural with it gone. Also, as a character Viktor seems far more confident (not overdone, but just actually more assertive and decent) as a male.
  • Some music choices are okay, although one from the first episode ends up once again like the "show wanted to seem cool and original" while picking the most on-the-nose song possible. It seems better than prior seasons so far, but again tries to be cooler than it is.
  • Most of the acting seems solid at least.
  • Overall, so far the show seems to be finding its stride.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Looks like Stranger Things Season 4 was broken into two uneven parts (maybe because of production work needing to be done on the final two episodes? I have no idea. The first seven released at the end of May, the final two air this coming Friday.) I figured I might as well try to catch up by the time the final two drop, just to avoid spoilers. Some comments below, no real spoilers.

Episode 1: Definitely feels darker while a bit better done in terms of production, script, and so forth. The kids are a lot older, especially the boys appearance-wise. They're also 17-20 years old but supposedly freshmen in high school? (and Joe Keery AKA Steve is 30 now.) I guess I can't bitch a ton, considering the two Spiderman casts before Holland, but it's a hard sell in spots. There was some nice parallel edits between the basketball game and the D&D game. They are still playing 1st edition based on time period + the DM screens / book pages I saw, I don't think 2nd edition still came out for some years yet. (I was playing 1st edition at college in 1987.) Joe Quinn is great as Eddie. This episode has some pretty creepy crazy moments in it and definitely feels like it took a step into more mature content; most of the last 15 minutes feels like it's totally channeling Nightmare on Elm Street, just with better production quality. It's a hell of an episode ending -- gratz ST, you actually managed to weird me out rather than being a kiddie pseudo-horror show.

Episode 2: I'm going to complain a little bit up front about the two things I didn't like or didn't find authentic (because this is literally my teenage years here, I graduated hs in 1986 from a rural out-of-the-way high school similar to Hawkins).
  • One: Despite my living in a rural and very religious area, and despite the anti-D&D groups being out there on a national level, no one really knew what they were because they weren't typically relevant. So seeing people in Hawkins getting anti-RPGs was a little much. In HS I knew about six other people who played D&D and other TSR games. I actually gave a speech in my high school class (persuasion speech, was the assignment) to persuade why RPGs like D&D were productive and healthy, and afterwards people said they liked it but didn't really know what RPGs were -- and this is traditional religion / people who have since gone evangelical and are dancing in glee over the Roe decision. Basically that whole social issue was a handful of dumbass anti-gamer moms making a stink because their druggie kid did something self-destructive or criminal while also having dabbled in D&D, but there was never a pandemic of RPG maniacs out there doing anti-social shit nor were many people outside of gaming even aware of the games.
  • Two: Bullying happens, but I'm so sick of the crazy tropes where it is always ratcheted up to eleven. I say this even as someone who was bullied in middle school. (For example, when I was on crutches for six weeks, people during class would steal the foam pads on the tops of my crutches and pass them around during class to keep them away from me / do obscene things with them and not give them back. I was bullied in other ways as well.) A lot of the bully sequences in here are just crazy, were more likely to happen in middle school (in high school people tend to be more focused on their own things), and far too public -- typically the bullying was a little more behind the scenes, so the perps could get away with it and gaslight you after. I consider this tropey plotting to be rather lazy, and it was all to force El into the crazy situation that plotline is currently at.
Aside from this, the Russian hostage plotline seems kind of bonkers too. I'm just like "yeah, fine, it's Stranger Things, whatever," but seriously? // But the Vecna plotline is going as expected, and is decent enough.

All in all, season 4 seems a marked improvement on earlier seasons. However, the episodes are all too damned long. Some shows might be able to pull off 80 minute episodes routinely, but not you, ST. They all feel too long and I keep pausing and looking at the time left. COuldn't they have broken these down differently? And couldn't they have made a better season split, unless there's a reason they are front-loading seven episodes? You'd think they would have had a more even split, and could have split it up into more episodes versus these overlong ones.

EDIT: Not much to say about Episode 3 (the primary takeaway is that El is going to try to regain her powers), but... I think Episode 4 might be my favorite of the entire show so far. They do crib from Silence of the Lambs (not an 80's film) briefly, but there's a number of things that happen in this episode that either caught me off-guard or actually made me feel something emotionally. There are actually action sequences of urgency. There's three different plotlines in general; one of them actually pissed me off (I'm still kind of mad and want a particular character to die in a fire); another one has a great impromptu Bluff roll in it; and the third arc actually choked me up. It might be the only time I have been moved by something in this series -- and it's tied to actually focusing on a particular character's arc, and the cast member nails their role so well in this episode. Pretty great performance. I wish the entire series had been this solid. I'm surprised and a little impressed. This might be the only episode I would rewatch on its own.

EDIT2: Finished the season last night. This might be the first season I'd call "solid." More mature approach, cast is older, storytelling is actually better. There's still some dumb stuff (like, does JIF still come in glass jars? Not sure, but not here in the USA at least -- but they needed it as glass, not plastic, for a convenient plot point) -- that kind of thing is sloppy to me -- but they actually managed to pull the multiple parallel plots together by the end while having a lot of cathartic moments. I can't say I'm keen on the Duffers picking up duties for King's "The Talisman," but to be honest that story isn't much different than what they are doing now with the Upside Down, so they've had practice.

This season also has some interesting guest casting. For example, this guy:

tom-wlaschiha[1].jpg


who most of us are far more acquainted with as this guy:

 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Now comes the keyboard dance of avoiding all the Stranger Things spoilers until i can finish the damn thing.



EDIT: Done.

Hats off to those guys, they really pulled through a great season. This has been one of the most enjoyable TV shows I've seen this year, whereas I was somewhat indifferent to the first three seasons.

The writing really had interwoven threads throughout the season and a lot of the lore came together satisfyingly. The characters also were allowed to experience a range of emotions (dark to happy) in a way that felt real, and there were actually super-high stakes that were identifiable, putting the viewers on edge. Some real acts of heroism especially in the finale, and I love how there were still three separate groups of character but all of them were contributing to this final conflict, even though only one person technically even has "superpowers." Love binds them all together in a way that didn't work in the IT films; I find it impressive Stranger Things finally surpassed some of the visual medium materials it has been aping all along.

We have a monologuing baddie, but it was okay because (1) it fit his persona, (2) there was an emotional hook for him to do so, and (3) it basically fills in the information we were lacking.

The episodes were long, yes, but I don't feel like the time was really wasted anywhere especially as the season continued. I appreciate the chance for characters to actually talk and their emotions to breathe, and I felt like it upped the stakes. it really gave the season a sober feeling, more weight and heft than normal, and set up the crux moments to be very powerful. And you can tell confident writing because it gave a good 30 minutes to wind everything down after, rather than just dropping all the threads in a "whew we're done" spasm. Getting back to "IT," Stephen King gives a lot of pages to closing out his monsterpiece, and I appreciate it here in this medium too.

One of my favorite clips from the finale involves Eddie shredding in pure metal-bard mode, it was so awesome I almost cried. And another moment involving Molotov cocktails and bullets was better than a Carpenter film -- crazy stuff. And then the show had the balls to end on a crazy ominous note that sets up the final season. The lines are drawn; the final battle is about to commence.
 
Last edited:

Kingu Kurimuzon

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
20,940
MBTI Type
I
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
It's a point of pride for me that I am usually very good at predicting twists and turns in films and tv shows, but I admit Mr. Robot's big season 1 reveal was not expected. Although I did accurately call Shayla's fate.

I should really like this show, yet I'm already partway through season 2 and I'm just not feeling it. I thought a show about a 5 with social anxiety might be right up my alley too. I did feel his struggle when describing and showing his SA in the first episode, but then the show quickly went into a Lynchian/Nolanesque identity crisis play. Again, should be right up my alley, yet it isn't clicking for me. Struggling to keep engaged with this one, and hoping it might still reel me in.

Part of the problem is the show already feels super dated to 2015/6. It's hard to stay engaged with a show that is written as topical commentary when the world has already changed so much in half a decade. The commentary on capitalism is still relevant, yet everything else in this show feels very much like a moment frozen in time
 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Season 2 is probably my least favorite season.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Pretty fascinating review of the appliances used for the Vecna character on Stranger Things S4, how they were designed, developed, and then applied while still recognizing there's a person under there with biological constraints... Usually we would only see this amount of time and money applied to feature films. Same team that did the Night King for GoT.

 

Z Buck McFate

Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
6,068
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Started the last season of Stranger Things and I haven't read any comments above yet (plan to once I'm done watching), but I think it's super funny that (once again, like the previous season) I find incorrect costume and hair distracting enough to break suspension of disbelief.

Dangerous creatures and/or demons escaping from other realm called the Upside Down -> No problem, suspension of disbelief granted.

1986 Midwest highschool without a single person wearing stirrup pants -> 100% not believable, would never have happened.

ETA: I am really loving Ryder this season though. Heathers caliber charisma.
 
Top