You get a sense of this in Monty Python Speaks. Cleese and Chapman and Palin and Jones were the ones who often worked together, Gilliam and Idle mostly worked on their own. Idle was there because he had the musical and writing talent and Palin said Idle is the only one who could convincingly pull off the Man who only speaks in annagrams, and Jones thought Idle played the best woman.
Yeah, I agree on that. Esp with Idle being the best femme, lol. The others really milked those dress-up gags for kicks. And Idle's musical talent was the strongest in the group.
Idle is the only one I met (briefly), in passing, when I did an interview down at 7th Level in the mid-90's when they were making the Monty Python games. Didn't really get to talk to him. I get the feeling both he and Cleese are very strong-willed and have their own ideas about how things should be done (even before all this blowout mess).
But i also felt like Cleese collaborates better; and Palin and Jones seem to collaborate the best? Not sure about Chapman since he died so long ago, and Gilliam is just a crazy man lol. I think he just has a wild vision (plus, he's used to exercising his vision as a director) and likes to be set loose to play off what others are doing in a group, but otherwise might veer between highly sociable and incredibly cantankerous.
But if you look at most of what Cleese and Idle did together it was always very antagonistic. But it sucks they dont like each other. Idle and Cleese were my favorite. Though Idle has definitely ridden the tales of Python the most, and has seemingly always been the one more cynical of it as a money making oprtunity. Iirc he touches on this a bit in one of his books. But he's been the most involved with keeping as a thing if memory serves.
it might be, because I didn't feel like Idle did as much as the others did in separate projects after Python mostly ended. They've all otherwise managed to do a lot of projects with other people or their own independent gigs. (Palin had his exploration show or tour guide show or something too?)
Cleese, Palin, Jones, and Gilliam all moved fairly quickly and solidly into other things. But Cleese got pretty turned off to it after Chapman died(i think thats when it stopped being fun for him.)
Chapman was apparently more intuitive in terms of humor and could just contribute something to shake things up, rather than planning out a lot of gags. He was kind of a catalyst and gave him the leads in their early films because they thought he could act, the others were more silly in their approach. (I think Cleese actually did a wonderful job straight acting in A Fish Called Wanda.) But he definitely seemed very close to Chapman.
I mean, if I was gonna pick one to stir up antagonism, it would have probably been Idle. He seems kind of opinionated and also not afraid to just blurt things out. I think Terry Jones (now gone) and Michael Palin come across as the least combative.
Cleese might be the strongest writer in the bunch, longer form scripting at least. (He actually got a Best Original Screenplay Oscar nom for AFCW.) Jones of course had his wonderful fairy stories and books.
EDIT: Of course then there is this inanity, which has irked me about Cleese who otherwise I have enjoyed.
... Cleese has long stoked the flames of culture war by rejecting
so-called cancel culture,
supporting Brexit, and
standing up for oppressed, millionaire transphobes at the expense of his reputation. Idle, conversely, uses the site to call John Cleese an “
entitled git” and tweet things like “
fuck Netflix and fuck documentaries.” But he also has a much more
level-headed view of the victimization funhouse that Mr. Cleese lives inside, where white guys are supposedly struggling to espouse their hatred publicly in a way that the broader culture accepts.