Over the past year, I have slowly come to realize that I'm probably best politically aligned / identified as being neo-Marxist (post-Frankfurt School), with anarchist leanings. I know I have much reading ahead of me, which will serve either to cement or somewhat modify these current views, although I'm always going to be categorically left of center; that'll never change. On my reading list are the works of Rosa Luxemburg, Kropotkin, and Rudolf Rocker. If anyone can recommend titles from these authors I absolutely must read first, please do.
While I still hesitate to use the "C" word to define myself, I'm on a journey towards better understanding the perspectives of other leftists in their respective countries, with a view towards what I can do in my own country to protect myself and others against the onslaught of laissez-faire, late-stage capitalism (and its bedfellow, corporatism) and help effect the needed changes. (This would benefit most of us in the U.S. today, who are effectively now the working class whether we want to admit it or not; we've clearly reached the point where we're all some variety of proletarian, just with slightly differing levels of privilege... but when we get down to brass tacks, proletarians.)
Aye, some of them can be worth a read, I'd not bother with any of the neo-marxists, Frankfurt school or otherwise, Kolakowski wrote a great (and scathing for the most part) history of Marxism which is worth a read. I liked it. Even if I thought that some of my own favourite thinkers, like Erich Fromm, got a real drubbing in it.
Rudolf Rocker is a good read, I liked all of his books when I read them. Personally, I think you may like to read GDH Cole, if you can find any of this books, he was a socialist but thought the patterns of servility produced by capitalism where the real problem, or Bertrand Russell's Proposed Roads To Freedom, largely for the same reasons. These are ideas that I think are dated, most of them badly, although I think they are worth a read out of interest, some of them are very good writers and they can clarify your own values.
Practically most of the best ideas presently revolve around Universal Basic Incomes, or some version of it, the earliest book I know which discussed a version of it was Socialism and Personal Liberty, its still available on amazon, it was written by someone who was an early critic of what the marxists were doing following Lenin and Trotsky's Coup in the country. Most of what he wrote stands up, I'd say. Its also a book that predates the welfare state (for good socialist opposition to welfarism there's GDH Cole, in Irvine's collected socialist works anthology, or even Irvine himself, I think he wrote an entire book on it). Some of the renewed interest in UBI resembles this early thinking. Some doesnt.
Anyway, I think UBI is a good idea because it might permit people to be as capitalist or socialist as they like/have the means to be. Some people will make the break with the having mode or existence and look into the being mode, others wont and might just burn themselves out with drugs and consumerism. Its their call (and their consequences). For everyone else, well, they're free to decide if they want to join a co-operative, a workers council, a balanced job complex (participatory economics), a corporation or a traditional business. I like the idea of an economy which is much more diverse and has both traditional and innovative forms of workplace and management or self-management. None of the "single pattern plans" generated by either capitalism or socialism are anything to write home about.
Good reading friend.
Finally, its just me personally, but I think reading the AD&D typology grids with the axis chaos-law(order) and good-evil, provides an interesting lens with which to appraise most things, political ideologies included.