Red Memories
Haunted Echoes
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2017
- Messages
- 6,277
- MBTI Type
- ESFP
- Enneagram
- 215
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
I have a bit of a fluid political perspective, which may be on the right track or not, but I tend to observe that during a crisis, you need more regulation and even distribution of resources. For example, if a hurricane destroys a city, it is constructive to have authority manage distribution of resources, make coordinated efforts for safety protocols, etc. When the natural environment has the most chaos, it is well balanced with intentional controls. In these environments the free market process takes hold of the imbalances, and you end up with people hoarding fresh water, and others pulling out their gold teeth to buy it.
Then, when the environment is stable, and resources are strong, too much control can create imbalances. In those environments, the natural process aspects of the free market can maintain balance.
In this way, my feeling is that right now it is good to have more democratic processes to manage this pandemic and the economic crashing that will happen. As society stabilizes, I could see it being good to have an intelligent, level-headed, reasoned person of character on the Right, a Republican candidate take office to systematically question and remove some of the controls put in place during this crisis phase.
I can appreciate people disagreeing with this position. I don't proclaim great political expertise - it's not my profession, but I tend to value flexible thinking that can adapt to different environments and to pull away from social, tribal dynamics that resist reason.
Balance of power can be very important actually and I think you made some great points here. Economically speaking of course. I wish republicans weren't so avidly against social movements though.