hurl3y4456
New member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 298
- MBTI Type
- SINE
We all know that everyone uses intuition to a degree, however, it would make sense that certain functions acting in couples/pairs would mimic intuition. Some may believe they utilize intuition as a dominant function according to the information portrayed online pertaining to it, but it could be based on functions acting together that yield the same output. Someone who uses Ni in upper stack will soak in external input over time to feed the subconscious such that a sudden insight/realization or vision is born. The intake of external input will be a function of the end product. That is, if someone uses Ni coupled with Fe, then external intake will be a function of the object (people). If this was not the case, then the point of saturation would be less likely to be satisfied (defined as the point in time at which enough inputs have been translated from the external to the subconscious mind). For some cases, an Ni user will know something bad is going to happen without a conscious awareness of how they attained the conclusion....It makes sense that to maximize Ni potential, the received inputs must be broadened, meaning that it will be generalized from a larger span of reference. Now, if someone uses Se with introverted thinking closer to dominance, then similar conclusions should be made since Ti internalizes external input. The main difference is that focusing on the external for a pleasurable experience implies that the intake of inputs will be more specific (narrower/intensified focus) rather than generalized. However, Ti can formulate the discrete Se inputs over time to arrive at the same consensus as an Ni user. The difference is taking the summation of an area of inputs (Ti) versus taking the integral of an area of inputs (Ni). The intensity of focus on the external brings more reward for Se users. Therefore, the frequency and depth of Ni use will be decreased proportionately to the intensity of outward focus. Ti use would help create a broad internal map/framework of the inputs and therefore, the depth of insight would be similar to Ni. The distinction lies in how the connections are formulated. There could also be some similarity between Si and Ni use. Some Si users read veraciously to attain depth of insight, which can lead to a high degree of abstractness and wisdom beyond their years. Perhaps the accumulation of insights yielded from Ni users over time will make it likely for an Si user to falsely assume being an Ni user.