But personally, I'm not a fan. Only because I'm not into that kind of music.
i can hear good music even if i wouldnt personally like it and i think this band is a piece of pop poop. they simply doesent have what a good band needs. i can understand if some people who like what they say, like the emo sound and doesent look music in so critical way likes it.
sorry but im going to have to laugh at you a little
do you mean musical talent as good at playing instruments and writing good original music or something totally else? i only heard theyr hit songs + few randoms and based on them, they sound like some mediocre high-school band what comes to playing instruments and seriously if you would listen more of real music instead pop like this you would notice that the band has nearly nothing original in them
sorry again for being honest, i think ill run away so i wont get slapped![]()
Pretty much every song I've ever heard from them except "Nine in the Afternoon" has been awful. The singer has no idea how to sing properly. As Mike Myers would say, he puts "the emPHAsis on the wrong sylLABle." He is like a faggy young Bruce Springsteen, trying to fit twice as many words into a song as it should have. The songcraft is generally shoddy, too. They add studio flourishes rather than writing strong hooks, and the guitar sound is muddy and indistinct. The finished product is a bunch of shrieking, pseudo-literary crap.
P.S. They also have some of the worst song titles of any band in history.
I take it you think guys in eye liner are "faggy"? I think it's hot. But that's got nothing to do with their music.
I also think the song titles are GREAT and I love Brendon's voice, and I already stated how subjective that is so I won't argue with you.
No, eyeliner is fine. David Bowie, Marc Bolan, Brett Anderson, Boy George. . . some of my favorite male vocalists. Brendon Urie is faggy because he just whines and shrieks. He doesn't even make it interesting like Brian Molko.
The song titles are long, pretentious, and vapid. You can love his singing all you like, but it's not very good. The voice itself isn't bad, but it's over the top and stylized in all the wrong ways.
There's a good reason why these tables are numbered honey, you just haven't thought of it yet.
Yeah, that's a good example of a terrible song title. In fact, the chances of a song with a title like "There's a Good Reason Why These Tables Are Numbered Honey, You Just Haven't Thought of It Yet" being any good are practically nil.
Have you ever actually heard it?
Incidentally, I wonder if there is some biological component in females liking to hear males interchangeably whispering and shreiking.
Yes, of course I have heard the song. That's how I know it sucks.
Do you hate the second album just as much as the first? Just curious. I know some people prefer either the first album OR the second album. I like both for different reasons.
I found the second album to be a slight improvement, but I still don't like it much.
Huh, I think it some of the songs on it are extraordinarily creative and original pop songs. Pas De Cheval? By the Sea? She Had the World?
Northern Downpour is also very pretty.
Do you just dislike the entire "emo" genre by default - do you also hate My Chemical Romance and Thursday?
"Pas De Cheval" is mediocre. Has some horns and sounds better than they usually do, but it doesn't do much.
And isn't it "Behind the Sea?" That song is pretty good. Very unlike their first album.
I like My Chemical Romance and dislike Thursday, but most of the bands who would fall under the emo umbrella are pretty bad-to-atrocious.
Sadly, I only own and have listened to their first cd.
I was a Panic! At the Disco fan.
But I've only heard of the "nine in the afternoon" song from the new album...I should really try to listen to it. I have no idea why I havent.
But I actually enjoy their music very much![]()
Yay! Finally someone else who appreciates them!![]()