I've been reading bits and bobs concerning MBTI recently and its raised a bit of an issue for me. Whilst I identify with the "personal" bits of the descriptions of NTs/INTPs and see myself in the behaviours, I'm questioning my response in light of the strong interest predicted in science and maths- neither of which really float my boat. So I guess my question is whether their are many ( there will be some) NTs whose main, academic shall we say, interest is in something wholy unrelated to science or maths?
You can't use that text and a word like synechdochial. You just can't.I think the common claim that INTPs are particularly interested in the "hard" sciences and mathematics are synecdochical; I find that INTPs are drawn to a multiplicity of complex subjects, including history, anthropology, psychology, philosophy, systematic theology, literary theory/criticism, et al.
You can't use that text and a word like synechdochial. You just can't.
Fuck, I misspelled it. *kills self, others*I'm not aware that I used the word "synecdochial".
![]()
Plenty. I don't care for calculation, being as it's not treading new ground and is detail-oriented, but I like math concepts.
I think I got a 100 on my Calculus final because I was able to decipher problems in non-standard ways when I'd forgotten a step or two in the "proper method."
Me too, partially because I don't know what synecdochical means.I'm having a hard time understanding how the claim that INTPs are particularly interested in math/science is synechdochical.
Me too, partially because I don't know what synechdochical means.
I think it might be a misapplication of the word.It's a device where you refer to a whole by calling it a part, or refer to a part by calling it a whole. In this case, the only thing I could see is maybe if we actually referred to INTPs as "scientists" (since we say that most scientists are INTPs, so we refer to INTPs as scientists, or refer to the part as the whole).
I think it might be a misapplication of the word.
I'm having a hard time understanding how the claim that INTPs are particularly interested in math/science is synechdochical.
A synecdoche is a trope usually used to denote a whole by referencing a part; "All hands (sailors) on deck" is an example that is frequently heard, and many would be familiar with. I would say that the claim that INTPs are drawn to the hard sciences and mathematics is a denotation of a totality of complex subjects, that would consist of almost innumerable subjects, and their various subdisciplines, of which the hard sciences and mathematics are a part.
It's not a figure of speech in this case though. Now I know what it means, watch out everybody.I know what a synechdoche is, as per my last few posts. I think I understand what you're saying, though. The use of the words "mathematics" and "hard sciences" to describe the interests of INTPs is using a part to describe the whole of the INTPs interests, of which any number of disciplines outside of specifically math or science may be included. Gotcha.
It's not a figure of speech in this case though. Now I know what it means, watch out everybody.
Now I know what it means, watch out everybody.
Merisms are all the more fun.
I've run the thought back and forth through my mind, and I've concluded that you're obviously posting drunk after rhetoric class.