I blame it for being the function that occasionally catches me while I'm overstressed and runs a film of what horrible things could happen through my head... in which case I think it sucks and needs to die![]()
If I understand the theory correctly, all the SPs use Ni to some extent... so tell me, how do you understand/use Ni?
I often don't get caught up in the flow of Se, I think.. I think Ni stops me in terms of.. small artistic choices. Not that I want to say I'm a particularly serious musician, but I might get some realization on the direction something could go when I'm strumming a guitar for awhile, and suddenly see that I can incorporate some element of a two year old riff I never did anything with, or just getting some impression of a motif or scene, and making something new from the different ideas and elements. Rinse, repeat. A lot of this could very well apply to..uh.. just about anything. Playing with legos, for example.Synthesizing comes from Ni, I think.
It might be there socially speaking, as well.. I think my eye moves towards the depth/meaning of experience, as I'm among people sometimes..what I do with it is an entirely different matter. If it's positive and light, it's probably in how I'll put a humorous spin on experiences (as long as it's not too odd.. happens sometimes). Insight might be negative too, in the form of social criticism..but more from the Fi angle (I think INFJs are.. looking more for the transcendent/consensus building angle in their criticism. While my goal isn't transcendence necessarily.. and I don't really care about marking my position or causes with words either. Fe is pretty good with that, I guess. Tamske talked about "Fi-Ni" angst once. I really liked her post on that).
Exactly how a function manifests itself can vary from one person to another. In SPs, Ni isn't terribly well developed. When it get used, it is often just as a tendancy to reserve opinion on something, leaving the conclusion open until the person has had chance to use the prefered Se function to go and have look for themselves.
Or to put it another way: "I'll believe it when I see it."
Would it be different for ISxPs than for ESxPs, though, since theoretically it is Ti/Fi, Se, Ni, Fe/Te versus Se, Ti/Fi, Fe/Te, Ni?
I often don't get caught up in the flow of Se, I think.. I think Ni stops me in terms of.. small artistic choices. Not that I want to say I'm a particularly serious musician, but I might get some realization on the direction something could go when I'm strumming a guitar for awhile, and suddenly see that I can incorporate some element of a two year old riff I never did anything with, or just getting some impression of a motif or scene, and making something new from the different ideas and elements. Rinse, repeat. A lot of this could very well apply to..uh.. just about anything. Playing with legos, for example.Synthesizing comes from Ni, I think.
Do you have any recollection of which topic Tamske might have talked about Fi-Ni in?.
Would it be different for ISxPs than for ESxPs, though, since theoretically it is Ti/Fi, Se, Ni, Fe/Te versus Se, Ti/Fi, Fe/Te, Ni?
... so tell me, how do you understand/use Ni?
Never trust a man in a suit. I am sure there is more than that, I'll think about it. I always thought Ni had some play in creativity for isfp as well.
Okay, I hereby give you a Convoluted Sentence Timeout.
Ni often takes the form of interest in the potentiality of something, what might happen what could be. I don't hink that functions automatically grant skills, such as painting or composing, but being able to look at a blank canvas and accept that it could become a master piece would be helpful in creativity.