infinite
New member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2014
- Messages
- 565
- MBTI Type
- ISTP
- Enneagram
- ~8
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
I'll post here instead.
My intent is simply being interested in why you think that way.
If the systems used very different names for functions, would that help in seeing where the differences are?
Well I don't really want to have to formulate an argument right now, cause I'm not that interested in the subject matter, and don't know your intent. So anything I say is going to be off the top of my head.
But for example there's a difference between objective sensing vs subjective sensing, and you can use that terminology between either system. There's also the part where, you know, the functions are labeled with the same names. Like the MBTI breakdown of an INTP is Ti, Ne, Si, Fe....and Socionics uses those exact same names of functions..Ti, Ne, etc....just maybe not in the same order.
My intent is simply being interested in why you think that way.
If the systems used very different names for functions, would that help in seeing where the differences are?