- Joined
- May 20, 2017
- Messages
- 5,815
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 9w1
- Instinctual Variant
- so/sx
You all know me (kind of). Based solely on your perceptions thus far what do you think my type is?
Re; your response to my rep: It's just... Kind of vibes. I don't know how you work or make decisions, and in our conversations, you are mostly responsive and follow the flow. It is simply that INTP 9 and INFP 9 are very starkly different, and I think you do fit INTP 9 more as a whole.
I'd love for you to elaborate on how INTP and INFP 9s are different! Please!![]()
...very starkly different
...really subtle
In theory you could be INTP. You say things that are not inconsistent with some of the INTPs I know. But you have never "felt" like an INTP to me, and I know quite a few. You have always come across as a very thoughtful (both meanings) INFP, or less likely, ISFP. You remind me a bit of an INFP former student.
He told me, and had done extensive study on the matter. In fact, was the one who introduced me to the topic.How did you know your student was an INFP?
Lol. Probably accurate.
I brainfarted hard. I am comparing several people in my head and at first I thought it was stark, till I actually had to put them into words, and went "shit".
Why do you think you're not an INFP, Hermit? Ti vs Te?
Hmm, I dont know if you've made up your mind now so disregard this if it's done. But I do think you have some bias here. Because on one hand, you are referencing functions, but on the other hand, you're referencing descriptions. And description wise ISFJ and INTP are quite far apart. You seem to have a notion that Fi is self centered or selfish. I think this is not true at all! IxFPs are feelers first and foremost. If anything they would be more selfless and focused on relationships than INTP. I think these descriptions are somewhat goodI really don’t relate to the INFP descriptions, particularly when it comes to introverted feeling. No offense, but it seems too inwardly focused and prone to navel gazing. My emotions revolve more around other people and relationships (though not in a necessarily selfless way). People and relationships fascinate me. Emotion is very interesting too. Some emotions can seem silly or bad, some even dangerous (I don’t like those), but they are very human. I want to understand humanity. I want to be human. I’m so tired of cold, from others... from myself. I just want to be warm, so I’ve very purposefully made myself a warm and fuzzy persona.
So yeah, I relate to Fe much more than Fi. I also very much admire the SJ role of guardian or caretaker. It’s not something I’m good at, but I hope to be better with practice.
As for Ti vs Te, I can see both in me but Ti is far more natural to wield were as Te takes much more energy to activate. Analyzing my environment is far easier than controlling it. Though I will try if I feel it necessary, especially if I’m under stress.
I really don’t relate to the INFP descriptions, particularly when it comes to introverted feeling. No offense, but it seems too inwardly focused and prone to navel gazing. My emotions revolve more around other people and relationships (though not in a necessarily selfless way). People and relationships fascinate me. Emotion is very interesting too. Some emotions can seem silly or bad, some even dangerous (I don’t like those), but they are very human. I want to understand humanity. I want to be human. I’m so tired of cold, from others... from myself. I just want to be warm, so I’ve very purposefully made myself a warm and fuzzy persona.
So yeah, I relate to Fe much more than Fi. I also very much admire the SJ role of guardian or caretaker. It’s not something I’m good at, but I hope to be better with practice.
As for Ti vs Te, I can see both in me but Ti is far more natural to wield were as Te takes much more energy to activate. Analyzing my environment is far easier than controlling it. Though I will try if I feel it necessary, especially if I’m under stress.
You seem to have a notion that Fi is self centered or selfish. I think this is not true at all!
It's the same reason why I did not relate to INFP, personally. The combination of I,N,F,P makes it seem like the most intuitive, the ultimate romantic, dreamer, lyricist, poet, etc. None of that fit me. They are described as being idealists, deep humanists, extremely vivid imaginations, excellent writers, etc. If you find yourself not relating to these parts you might want to look into ISFP too. I think everyone is just assuming N because you type as INTP. But it’s worth considering.
Although that above quote does sound somewhat detached.
I think these descriptions are somewhat good
Portrait of an INFP
Portrait of an ISFP
Portrait of an ISFJ
Portrait of an INTP
Ok, I get where you're coming from now. It does make sense then.That is not at all what I meant to communicate. The INFP I’ve had the privilege to observe closest had a very rich inner life (or world) of emotion and imagination that just doesn’t exist within me. My imagination and emotion are more outwardly sparked, were as his world existed much more inwardly and independently (not selfish). I’m not saying Fi users aren’t loving to people — they’re very loving. But they also have this cool little inner world that I don’t have so much, so my emotions play elsewhere. Not better or worse just different. And they seem know their feelings very intimately, which comes from long study. Much longer than I would have patience for. Nothing wrong with that.
Lol that is how INFPs are depicted.I’ve looked into ISFP and Se-Ni really doesn’t fit.
I’m afraid I didn’t relate much to any of these profiles. Sorry.
People and relationships fascinate me. Emotion is very interesting too. Some emotions can seem silly or bad, some even dangerous (I don’t like those), but they are very human. I want to understand humanity. I want to be human. I’m so tired of cold, from others... from myself. I just want to be warm, so I’ve very purposefully made myself a warm and fuzzy persona.