I was just going by looks.
It's a classic Mal reply.
I know I'm a class act. But thanks!
IFP me thinks.
I read that he was brought up from a young age to be the person he was. So does it mean that his ideas weren't from a man who was a natural at it, he simply had his head filled with ideas to such an extent he lived and preached throughout his life whatever which was was taught to him and his immediate environment.
This maybe a harsh thing to say - the above makes me think of a parrot.
"Jiddu Krishnamurti was an Indian speaker and writer on philosophical and spiritual subjects. In his early life he was groomed to be the new World Teacher but later rejected this mantle and disbanded the organisation behind it." wikipedia
I read that he was brought up from a young age to be the person he was. So does it mean that his ideas weren't from a man who was a natural at it, he simply had his head filled with ideas to such an extent he lived and preached throughout his life whatever which was was taught to him and his immediate environment.
This maybe a harsh thing to say - the above makes me think of a parrot.
This was kind of the opposite of what happened. He was chosen at a young age to be some kind of leader, but rejected the thing he was supposed to be a leader of (some group affiliated with the Theosophical Society) and spent the rest of his life preaching (kinda) that no one should ever let anyone else fill their head with ideas, no authority should ever be above questioning, etc. Kind of the penultimate 6w5, I think. He even had outbursts at people for too easily accepting the ideas he was preaching, if I remember correctly.
???
Was that suppose to contradict what i said or has a completely different purpose?