No because it's in the intent. Philosophy doesn't aim to lie, and science doesn't get everything right. Science flails about going off new findings and past mistakes.
From your reasoning more of science is a lie than it is truth. Science is not exempt if philosophy is not. Both were one even, until the 19th century or so, being referred to as "natural philosophy". I think what you say is a lie should simply be thought of as being incorrect.
There is a more subjective nature to philosophy, it isn't as conclusive as science, but it's not so much the result as it is the exploration of thought, ideas and concepts.
(Don't think I'm against science btw, I have passion for both, just trying to make a point.

)