Kingu Kurimuzon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,940
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Yeah, I posted this video in my blog the other day when I saw it. I found it interesting especially because the cult leader is in the video -- he actually agreed to talk and comment on the collapse of his cult. I wish the documentary were longer.
But the angle you raise always interests me. I feel like my family was crazy dysfunctional because of my dad's alcoholism and my mom's inability to cope. I do have residual damage from growing up in that environment, but I never joined a cult like this. Some people seem to look for the external structure and need it, or they are missing something and wanting to find something that provides feelings of worth and substance (or even closeness / part of a community) which the cult can provide.
Some of the people seemed sincere in terms of being skeptical and then having some kind of experience that they decided validated the guru as a leader of spiritual truth... but you have to wonder about the phenomena of "spiritual faith" and these kind of transcendent experiences... like, are they truly evidence of spiritual truth or simply psychological experiences that people across the spectrum can have / other states of awareness and euphoria, regardless of the religious belief in question? But then it gets attributed to a specific religious system or set of truths?
Agreed. The entire initial question is naive and pandering, in an apologist sort of way to be honest. For starters, why wouldn't intelligent people be lulled into these situations? Cults work like any other abusive relationship. It doesn't start on the predication that to be intelligent (upper class, poor, tough etc) is to be immune. That's fallacy.
What happens is you're given rules and structure. You are given time or by condition accept these as normal because they MAKE SENSE. That's the first step. Then what happens is you're rewarded for that. Then you're chastised by going against it. Now you have normalcy. You know where to step and mistep.
Then - and here's the cult aspect kicking in, the initial rules change. They mutate. You are now told what you know is false by the very same person who explained the situation/belief to begin with. Then confusion creeps in and during this time, you're vulnerable and whomever is leading this manipulation (cult of personality) will infuse their own version of that initial truth with their own. Often there is violence or the threat of it.
All it takes to be seduced by a cult is a willingness not to question with a desire to live with integrity. It's f*cked up but perfect storms exist.
Maslow's written some pretty good stuff about this if you're interested. I've read a lot of it because its a question I've wondered about and I dont believe that anyone has really demonstrated a monopoly on truth yet, some are just more nearly right than others.
Yeah, I get that. I definitely feel an uneasiness when they kept saying how spiritually awakened they were. It's like a trigger word, you just know when it's used insincerely.
Maslows pyramid explains why people have a desire to start and join cults in many ways. I theroize that people who join cults are those who are trapped in the Safety and Belonging stages and cults will then keep them in line and control by offering those two needs but never allowing them to get to the top as that would mean they no longer need the cult to offer them the needs.
Surely, even when you agree with whatever it is, it ought to send alarm bells ringing when its covered in a certain way. Like propaganda or delivered with loaded questions or whatever.
Defining intelligence is very difficult.