Tayshaun
New member
- Joined
- May 13, 2007
- Messages
- 172
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
Doesn't everyone love ENTPs?![]()
I don't know, but I do think xNFJiminy loves one!
Doesn't everyone love ENTPs?![]()
now im even more exited!
i think the reason medieval art looks the way it does is because of a certain cosmopolitan feeling to the whole of the middle ages (only one chruch, france/germany/italy united etc.) AND the fact that the artist/craftman dichtonomy hadn't yet permeaded western civilization as such.
consequently, medieval art needed a sort of common framework to work within; - to preserve that unity/cosmopolitanism in its aestetics.
am I wrong?
Very cool!...But it basically goes around the premise that, having been pretty much raised on medieval literature, I found it hard when at school I was expected to unquestioningly buy the standard line about how medieval art was the way it was because people didn't know about human bodies, proportion, perspective etc etc and that the Renaissance was when people started to learn about that stuff. I smelled a big fat sewer rat and thought hang on just a minute...
And it happened to be around the same time as I went to Egypt to visit a friend in Cairo, and of course I visited the pyramids and all that stuff. And I was looking at these ancient Egyptian works of art and how they stood there all screwy and with the eyes on the sides of the heads and the feet twisted round and all, right next to contemporary Roman and Greek statues of perfectly anatomical people. And I thought... hey... the Egyptians didn't do it because they didn't know about how to make things look realistic, because they obviously did, being surrounded also by Classical art. They must've chosen to do it that way for a reason; that style must've represented something to them that was important, which was why they clung onto the same style for thousands of years, despite the artistic innovations in the world around them.
So I put it together with what I knew of medieval culture already and medieval art, and figured y'know, the basic Byzantine style that was copied and elaborated on all over Europe for the best part of a thousand years, well, y'know they encountered other styles and stuff and especially the Italians and French, who still had these Classical statues around them and stuff, it's not like they didn't know that it was possible to make realistic pictures and sculptures. Like the Egyptians, they must've done things the way they did for a reason.
So I brainstormed and basically explained what that style of art meant to the medieval people, how it represented their worldview, why they weren't interested in realistic art and all that jazz. And I backed it up and proved it and everything with a lotta painstaking research and evidence. ...
But that statement was impeccably objective and reasonable!I don't know, but I do think xNFJiminy loves one!
Exciting. Never bored or boring.
This is true. I have a PhD motherfuckers. From Cambridge dammit. And yet I get condescended to and treated like some kind of bimbo with no attention span, by people whose greatest achievement is reaching 'that level' on WoW!
(or whatever, I never played it... better things to do)
And I have to listen to people going on about the 'shallow' range of ENTP knowledge and how we don't really know anything in depth, and how we're not deep thinkers and blah blah blah....zzzzz
This made me LMAO!!!
Usually what I do when I meet an obvious intellectual is start acting like an INTP. Then once they believe I'm an intellectual too, I starting doing more crazy "extraverted" stuff to mess with their heads.![]()
- Generally Fun to hang out with
- Most intellectually under-rated NT type
- Most likely to help you understand something you didn't understand before
- One of the few truly open minded types
- skilled in many different areas
- Does and says all the things I wish I had the guts to do or say
They also take criticism well, tend to be humble about their achievements.
They also take criticism well, tend to be humble about their achievements.
*nods* I see this one quite frequently in ENTPs.
Sometimes it's humility, and sometimes it's a tactic.
Nothing makes a hot-to-argue INTP squirm worse than telling him "I never thought of it that way--you're probably right" and walking away.
[snerk!]
*nods* I see this one quite frequently in ENTPs. They're also one of the very few types around that would consider the merit of my random ideas. I like them a lot.![]()
Sometimes it's humility, and sometimes it's a tactic.
Nothing makes a hot-to-argue INTP squirm worse than telling him "I never thought of it that way--you're probably right" and walking away.
[snerk!]
I dont recognize that from myself at all, but perhaps that's because I'm just a visiting INTP. If I were to convince someone of something, I'd be happy if he/she accepted the conclusions without a fight. Besides, it would only be a fight by the reasons that he/she would make it a fight![]()
I recognize two flavors of losing, and I have not specified exactly which I've ment: this has given unintended ambiguity for my statements.Actually, I do see that in myself. Though, I think, my intentions are misinterpreted when this happens. I actually prefer loosing arguments (based on solid reasoning) than winning them (where I would have learned neraly nothing).
ENTPs (in my experience) seem to be the best at winning arguments based on sound reasoning (bringing in things that are well outside of the current considerations, but still relevant) .
It is always disappointing when an intelligent person fails to convince me of something I don't currently believe. It feels like an opportunity lost to fundamentally change my thinking.
Oh, hey...nice avatar.
Be careful, though...there are several cats around here, and at least one owl.