Although the tests have plenty of bias, which most people noted. It would still be interesting to put the results next to types on a nice infographic..... just the percentages & type maybe ?
Done. Total N = 62
![]()
![]()
As I expected, the general relationship is:
Male | Te Ti Fi Fe | Female
That's pretty cool. I figure there could probably be a simple regression analysis done for strength of correlation with dom/aux functions. Right now M/F is computed as a binary, but there's quantitative data there too.
Taking into account the actual gender of the person, there might also be another socialisation component that might pull the scores away from that which would be predicted by function.
[/too lazy to do the analysis]
How did you get the numbers in your table - just averaged the M/F percentages reported by each member?Done. Total N = 62
As I expected, the general relationship is:
Male | Te Ti Fi Fe | Female
Yeah, I might try playing around with this on Matlab if I'm bored as hell one day.
P.S. I tried taking actual gender into account, but that makes the sample size too small.
Yeah, I might try playing around with this on Matlab if I'm bored as hell one day.
P.S. I tried taking actual gender into account, but that makes the sample size too small.
How did you get the numbers in your table - just averaged the M/F percentages reported by each member?
Done. Total N = 62
![]()
![]()
As I expected, the general relationship is:
Male | Te Ti Fi Fe | Female
Interesting that Fi-dom are more masculine than Fi-aux.
And the same is true for FJs. So it seems P-dom and F-aux are most traditionally feminine and not F-dom...which actually doesn't surprise me.
The idea that P types are more androgynous in their personality holds...
We have far less SFs than NFs too, and I wonder how that would affect the scores.
I think you're reading too much into it. The sample size is too small to identify anything beyond the most general trend.
I got 6% masculine (very low) and 39% feminine (average), which they call "casually feminine", whatever that means.
Why that makes me comparatively much more feminine than masculine, it is interesting that adding it up suggests I'm not really much of anything.