Gunboat Diplomat
New member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2017
- Messages
- 338
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
No, it is a fine and useful matter of principle. Some people may view it as a matter of tact. I view it in the context of what one hopes to accomplish, and the likely consquences - intended and unintended - of one's action. A "wrong" action will be counterproductive or bring undesired consequences. It doesn't require that the statement itself be wrong. Sure - I may have the right to spout my opinions at anyone I meet, but what is to be gained? In a discussion forum such as this, I might learn something or provide others with food for thought, but then we are willing participants in the threads where we post. IRL or in other online spaces, we might alienate a potential ally, break a confidence and lose someone's trust, lay ourselves open to identity theft, or many other things, all by exercising our right essentially to be stupid. We all have the right to do many things that bring mostly harm to ourselves and others.
It's quite a utilitarian view
"Having the right to do something doesn't mean you should be stupid going about it."
Which is a fair point. But my problem is with people saying: you shouldn't be doing this because someone won't like it. And that someone may throw a tantrum and maybe even kill someone. And now, suddenly, it is my problem and my responsibility. Someone getting unhinged, because they didn't like my opinions is definitely a bad consequence. But a society afraid to defend its most cherished values is a pretty bad consequence as well, isn't it?