Atomic Fiend
New member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2007
- Messages
- 7,275
Common sense is a swearword! Something to be looked down on! The word makes me feel sick ...
I don't even think it exists.
Common sense is a swearword! Something to be looked down on! The word makes me feel sick ...
Compiling all, here's my common sense ranking list!
ESTP
ESFP
ISTP
ESTJ
ISFP
ISTJ
ESFJ
ENTJ
ISFJ
INTJ
ENFJ
INFJ
ENTP
ENFP
INTP
INFP
My listing had IP switched with IJ and vice versa. Ooops.. moreover, I should have given more thought to the mathematical function that combines all the scores from the Jungian functions. Hm.Somewhat surprising, but not implausible. I would accept that. I'm mostly surprised that INTJs rank so lowly. ESFPs are kicking their asses there. Maybe Te should receive higher weighting? The bottom 3 are not at all surprising to me, and suggest that your list has probably got it right.
Santtu's dictionary
Entry: Common sense
-commonly considered as practical, sensible, common, real, usual and obvious.
Common sense can be gathered by observing what appears to senses (Se), experimenting, and thinking about it (Ti).
It can also be gathered by agreeing to commonly held opinions in a group (Fe) and recalling past experiences (Si).
Moreover, it can be gathered by influencing something concrete (S) and noticing how one's decisions work out in the real world and how they affect what is commonly thought about (Te).
Understanding everyone's personal feelings and value judgements (Fi) is also part of the common sense.
Ne can find many connections, some of which are practical - but I don't see Ni connected with "common sense" at all.
Edit: I feel compelled to comment on ESFP's high ranking on my list. I could call that type "The Popularist" .. their common sense circling around their title.
P's are dependent upon what? P's are more likely to separate themselves from the group structure which makes them more autonomous. J's are more likely to work together for the common good, while P's are more likely to simply act on their own.
But they're that much more vulnerable and dependent on the ones they are part of. Often, they just don't have the will-power and self-determination to decide that something is bad for them, and to act on that.
Commenting on lack of common sense on some types on my chart.. what some of those types have instead, is uncommon sense, understanding and capability through unusual means.
It was not a capability or coping ability chart.
How do they not fullfill the criteria of common sense in my book?
They may..
-arrive at conclusions through independent means
-challenge popular opinion
-be generally disagreeable
-desire to be correct rather than accepted, even at the cost of losing popular support for their idea
-be of investigating type
-not participate in groupthink
-seek long-term solutions rather than quick fixes´
-be practical in a less obvious way, rather than more obvious
-work against the system, rather than going along with it
-let theoretical or ethical values stop them
-not accept society's values or norms at face value
I too agree that murder is a serious crimeI'm not sure about the eleventh - what could a societial norm be defined as? There are obviously some societial norms (such as 'murder is a serious crime') which you'd obviously accept straight off. Also, what do you mean by 'at face value'?![]()
I too agree that murder is a serious crime![]()
But then there's lot of value judgements that people repeat amongst themselves without studying them; like that a job where you take care of people must be more valuable than one where you take care of machines, because people are more valuable than machines. Disagreement is handled by emphatetic counter-claim, "would you like to be left untreated, dieing on the street?"
(Yet there can be ineffective treatment, or some person's involvement in the treatment outcome may be very small. It may be that some other job increases people's wellbeing more by reducing risks of accidents, etc.)
Then norms. What I thought of as norms is that "a decent person stays quiet in the bus." or "it's ok to be loud an obnoxious on friday night" or "employed person should be appreciated more than an unemployed one". Some of those might be true to some extent more often than not.. but they're still something far from something to be universally agreed upon. Yet many people would gladly accept such norms without giving them a second thought.
Face value: apparent value, intended value. Or that's what I intended it to mean![]()
Xander said:It is common sense to tie your shoe laces so the leftover parts of your shoe laces aren't so long that you trip over them. It's also logical to do that too.
In terms of types that have common sense I'd say it's entirely context sensitive. An INTP can totally miss a detail like tying their shoe laces, esp tying them "right".
You could argue that STs would be best at common sense as they would more readily accept common practices into their thinking but that's also dependant upon the circumstances.
It may be that INTJs have the most common sense as they are always right.
However when you find one doing things perfectly when all that is required and indeed wanted is an adequate solution, that's not using their common sense to restrict their solution to what is necessary. It's going over the top.
I used to be like this, too! I am so thankful I can say "used to" because I have learned so much from my ISTP husband about balancing out time effectiveness and perfection (which doesn't actually exist anyway)....Yes, this sounds like me. Expending a ridiculous amount of energy and frustrating myself doing a seemingly menial task, just so I can do it 'my way' perfectly...
I remember the day I scored a great victory when I was able to - without any regret - hold a mushroom in my hand over the pot and just cut it up any which way into my spaghetti sauce!![]()
Sorry. I'm not putting that albatross back around my neck!But that's not fair! Some people will get larger slices of mushrooms than others! Nutritional intake would have been inequitable, especially if you did not control the number of mushroom slices issued per serving. :steam:
:yim_rolling_on_the_ That was very amusing!INTJMom,
I'm guessing that cooking is not a form of relief and relaxation to you then.
Note to self, never invite INTJMom round she'd have a coronary on the door step.
I used to be like this, too! I am so thankful I can say "used to" because I have learned so much from my ISTP husband about balancing out time effectiveness and perfection (which doesn't actually exist anyway).
When I think about how frustrated I used to get about the smallest things - even to the point of tears!
I remember crying in frustration because I was chopping a carrot to put in a homemade soup. I thought it was incumbent upon me to make each slice of carrot of equal width. As I worked my way toward the narrow end of the carrot, the equal width no longer seemed equitable, so I switched over to making each slice equal in "mass". I became upset because I was sure I wasn't doing it perfectly.
I remember the day I scored a great victory when I was able to - without any regret - hold a mushroom in my hand over the pot and just cut it up any which way into my spaghetti sauce!![]()
Meals that take longer than 30 minutes seem to require the same dedication as the birch twig form of relaxation. Personally I'll only be in the kitchen for more than 30 minutes if there's loud music on and no one else in the house.:yim_rolling_on_the_ That was very amusing!
Seriously, I laughed really hard.No, it's not a form of relief or relaxation. I am a pretty good cook though, as far as my food tasting good. I'm just a basic meat and potatoes kind of cook which I guess is just as well since a couple of my kids are fussy. I prefer a meal that only takes about 30 minutes or less to prepare.