I probably should not have referred to Ukraine in the context of this comment. I was trying to make the point Guyana is not likely to receive support from the UN, so when VG replied that the UN is a collective, and an individual member country may step up, I wanted to imply I thought that was unlikely. It's USA intervention or nada for Guyana (at least that's my prediction).
I don't think they even need to force them into Sinai. Just turn Gaza over to Egypt like it used to be before the 1967 war. Egypt doesn't want the hassle, but too bad so sad. Israel (and the collective west) should just stop providing an administrative support to Gaza, so if Egypt doesn't do it, they can sink or swim on their own. And they would certainly sink. But, hey, Gazan's are Egypt's/Arab world's "brothers in Islam" so their brothers can take care of them, leave the west (who Gazans all hate anyways) out of it.
I'd be down with that. Unfortunately, outside of financial aid, I don't think any of those countries can provide much military hardware outside of the UK.
I'm going to be civil and just say, "wow." I don't recall ever believing something like that.
I'm sure it's just the woke mind virus.
Probably. Maybe I could stop that if I found some catnip. Catnip is supposed to be calming to humans, maybe it could put the wokeness to sleep.
Because your head isn't so far up your own ass you buy that bullshit is brylcreem.
Some people unwind by getting off on winding up other people. Other people enjoy living vicariously through war crimes without having to deal with the consequences of nutting up and going to serve in wartime. Some kinds of cowards have no issue with people dying so long as it isnt their yellow asses and they get to go on pretending that for them everything is fine. You might be better off saving the catnip for chilling with the glaring. (Fun fact a group of cats is called a clowder, or a glaring.)
And if anyone is having difficulty determining who these people are - look for the ones cheering for it the loudest or trying to convince otherwise with word salads and conversative Twitter reposts.
What was that land from 1920 to 1948? In fact, let's go back to WWI. What empire ruled that region of the world? White people? Nah. The Ottoman Empire ruled all of the Levant and Middle East from the 15th Century until WWI. The Arabs and the British pushed out the Ottomans and the Arabs were told their independence would be honored. It was not and the British and the French created the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration after the Arabs helped them push out the Ottomans. The Balfour Declaration, issued by the British govt. in 1917 further complicated this when it promised a Jewish national home. Now, do you see why the Palestinians rejected the two state solution? The only solution anyone should want is a one state solution ( That's what - from the river to the sea actually means). Jews and Arabs with the same rights, a removal of the apartheid government in Tel Aviv. A pluralist nation. And if you don't know what a pluralist nation is - you're living in one.
I've seen a lot of back-and-forth on this so I appreciate the clarification here. I first heard about a one-state solution on another forum I used to frequent, a long time ago. I think I've mentioned it a few times but most people didn't seem to know what it was.
