Jeffster
veteran attention whore
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 6,744
- MBTI Type
- ESFP
- Enneagram
- 7w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
Apparently not enough to catch my joke 4 posts in.![]()
I'll admit I barely skimmed the responses before posting that.
Apparently not enough to catch my joke 4 posts in.![]()
I'll admit I barely skimmed the responses before posting that.![]()
Absolutely.Breaking the law under dire or extreme cases and circumstances - do you think this is right?
Very trueBreaking of the law cannot be inherently right or wrong, in my eyes. Certain acts can be, but whether or not something is legal is completely irrelevant where morality is concerned.
Breaking the law cannot be inherently right or wrong, in my eyes. Certain acts can be, but whether or not something is legal is completely irrelevant where morality is concerned.
...unless "not breaking the law" is a certain moral/value someone has.
Fixed.Lol @ my post before I caught the errors.
"Breaking of the law is cannot be...."![]()
Yeh, but that's why I put "in my eyes."
Subjective perspective, brah.
I think it's wrong to break the law.
Without exception, under almost any circumstance?
like what kind of circumstance?
Right or wrong is too subjective and ambiguous.
like what kind of circumstance?
Someone has a family member captive and they tell you that you have to taser an old lady to get for family member back safely.
A less extreme circumstance would be if you would break the traffic laws to speed to the hospital to get an injured friend help.
You are in the middle of the desert. There is no one for miles. You come to a stop sign. You stop.
Do you stop because it's the right thing to do?
Or do you stop because you're conditioned to stop at stop-signs?