This was a reply I made on the board. Okay, feel free to blast me for it here if you want:
I have no problem admitting that I am not always as purely rational as an NT might be. So what? There are drawbacks to both sides of the T-F dichotomy. An NF is better at imagining possibilities without regard for reality and an NT to determine if those dreams could become reality. The NF wants to bring out the human element, the NT wants to stick to what's true.
Really each side needs the other.
I no longer try to deny what I am. I want more than anything to understand what I am and to be the best at what I am that I can be. Part of that is admitting that feeling is a stronger attribute for me than logic. Like Dirty Harry says "A man has got to know his limitations." There is a lot of strength to come from knowing one's self well.
Part of the reason I think that a feeler might not want to admit these things is because so many thinkers don't fully appreciate what feeling brings to the human experience. My father was like that and my own image of myself was colored for many years by his prejudice and I wanted to change and become a thinker. But that was not possible and all I did was knock myself off my own personal balance and best nature.
Because feelers don't feel that their strengths will be appreciated, they may want to try and claim to be more logical than they might be. But I think that's a bit dangerous in a way. To try and suppress feeling in place of logic in a feeler means being cut off from what is most sure and best in them.
A Feeler being too sure of logic when it is not warranted, might cause over-confidence that could lead to a major blunder. Just as for a T being too overconfident of being sure of the human element and interpersonal relations could lead to a major blunder.
It is better for one to know themselves and face themselves in this life. We can only work from a basis of truth.
The opposition of F and T brings out the beauty in each. I am with Jung in his belief that opposition should always be delinated and no attempt to try and deny that it exists, because it is at the edges of life that reality is created. We can only be what we are, no more, no less.
I am primarily a Feeler and I am not going to make excuses for it. I am not going to try and claim that I am ultra logical. I am not.
I have no problem admitting that I am not always as purely rational as an NT might be. So what? There are drawbacks to both sides of the T-F dichotomy. An NF is better at imagining possibilities without regard for reality and an NT to determine if those dreams could become reality. The NF wants to bring out the human element, the NT wants to stick to what's true.
Really each side needs the other.
I no longer try to deny what I am. I want more than anything to understand what I am and to be the best at what I am that I can be. Part of that is admitting that feeling is a stronger attribute for me than logic. Like Dirty Harry says "A man has got to know his limitations." There is a lot of strength to come from knowing one's self well.
Part of the reason I think that a feeler might not want to admit these things is because so many thinkers don't fully appreciate what feeling brings to the human experience. My father was like that and my own image of myself was colored for many years by his prejudice and I wanted to change and become a thinker. But that was not possible and all I did was knock myself off my own personal balance and best nature.
Because feelers don't feel that their strengths will be appreciated, they may want to try and claim to be more logical than they might be. But I think that's a bit dangerous in a way. To try and suppress feeling in place of logic in a feeler means being cut off from what is most sure and best in them.
A Feeler being too sure of logic when it is not warranted, might cause over-confidence that could lead to a major blunder. Just as for a T being too overconfident of being sure of the human element and interpersonal relations could lead to a major blunder.
It is better for one to know themselves and face themselves in this life. We can only work from a basis of truth.
The opposition of F and T brings out the beauty in each. I am with Jung in his belief that opposition should always be delinated and no attempt to try and deny that it exists, because it is at the edges of life that reality is created. We can only be what we are, no more, no less.
I am primarily a Feeler and I am not going to make excuses for it. I am not going to try and claim that I am ultra logical. I am not.