You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.
Wow, I forgot about this thing. Takes me back to the good old days of ignorance.
Te (Extroverted Thinking) (35%)
your valuation of / adherence to logic of external systems / hierarchies / methods
Ti (Introverted Thinking) (75%)
your valuation of / adherence to your own internally devised logic/rational
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (85%)
your valuation of / tendency towards free association and creating with external stimuli
Ni (Introverted Intuition) (80%)
your valuation of / tendency towards internal/original free association and creativity
Se (Extroverted Sensing) (35%)
your valuation of / tendency to fully experience the world unfiltered, in the moment
Si (Introverted Sensing) (50%)
your valuation of / focus on internal sensations and reliving past moments
Fe (Extroverted Feeling) (55%)
your valuation of / adherence to external morals, ethics, traditions, customs, groups
Fi (Introverted Feeling) (30%)
your valuation of / adherence to the sanctity of your own feelings / ideals / sentiment
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
based on your results your type is likely - entp
It's a pretty terrible test. It asks mostly the wrong questions and assumes that behaviour = function. It's especially bad if you realise which questions mean which functions, which isn't exactly difficult. Spoiler contains my thoughts on the questions.
1) I recognize how things have always been. - Si: who couldn't recognize this?
2) I am very optimistic. - Ne: anyone can be optimistic. Ne users aren't necessarily optimistic.
3) My personal beliefs determine what I feel is right and wrong, what is important, and what is significant, regardless of the external beliefs. - Fi: This one is actually okay.
4) I sail my own course. - No idea; some introverted function. Too vague, and can apply to anybody. Forer effect.
5) I evaluate performance against measurable goals and standards. - Te: Could be either Je function really; what goals, what standards?
6) I organize the external world to support group harmony. - Fe: Fair enough, I suppose.
7) My sense of value is entirely internally based. - Fi: Okay.
8) I require novelty in my environments. - Ne: Could be either Pe function. People of higher intelligence require more novelty than average anyway, and they aren't all high Pe users, so this would be confusing for them, and shows that it isn't directly linked to a function.
9) I draw ethics purely from an within. - Fi: Okay.
10) I get insights into intrinsic patterns and connections that may not seem linked to the external world. - Ni: Too vague.
11) Because I consider it important I establish and build relationships with other people. - Fe: This is just human nature. Could apply to anyone.
12) I see the world as a bundle of possibilities to be explored and unraveled. - Ne: Okay.
13) I intuitively know and understand something without consciously being able to put it into words. - Ni: Doesn't necessarily mean Ni. Most people have has these moments.
14) I set or identify measurable goals for my efforts and the efforts of other people. - Te: Not specific enough. Who doesn't set goals?
15) I perceive the present world in relation to my past experiences and reactions. - Si: Seems okay.
16) I look for logical explanations or solutions to most everything. - Ti: Could apply to either T function.
17) I evaluate what is worth believing in and most important to who I really am inside. - Fi: Anyone can do this.
18) Image is important. - Se: nothing to do with functions.
19) Money is important to me. - Se: Not relevant at all.
20) I like to be free to explore new possibilities in my life. - Ne: Who doesn't want to be free to do what they want?
21) I experience the world without any additional processing, I just absorb it in its rawest form in the moment. - Se: Okay.
22) I enjoy fine-tuning a definition or concept to support a theory, perspective or framework. - Ti: Okay.
23) I modify models and frameworks to accommodate new data, thereby preserving inner logical consistency. - Ti: Okay.
24) I strive for logical consistency. - Ti: Kind of vague.
25) I desire high status. - Fe: Irrelevant.
26) I live to do things for other people. - Fe: Guess it's alright.
27) I judge ideas, attitudes and behaviors according to my values. - Fi: Okay.
28) I prefer things to stay the same. - Si: Not necessarily Si. Vague.
29) I seek internal logical consistency in my life. - Ti: I'm not sure if Ti users actually consciously want/are aware of this.
30) I get bored easily. - Se/Ne: Forer effect all over.
31) There is nothing more important than fully living in the moment. - Se: Generally speaking, many people try to live in the moment. Society tells us to.
32) I see the world as a place full of people that deserve help and compassion. - Fe: So it's the choice between Fe user and being a sociopath? And why couldn't it be a Fi value?
33) I am very happy with my life. - No idea: Completely irrelevant anyway. Depends on other factors.
34) Sometimes it's not what I want, it's what others want that's more important. - Fe: Once again, its choosing between Fe user and complete selfishness.
35) I swim against the current. - Some introverted function: Too vague, and irrelevant. I'm sure many people think they're "swimming against the current".
36) I use my inner understanding of how ideas and things logically fit together to help me understand how things work. - Ti: Fairly okay.
37) I like to change, reinvent and experiment with the external world in order to find new and interesting combinations and patterns. - Ne: Okay.
38) I do things differently. - Fi?: I bet most people put "accurate".
39) I display loyalty to the people in the groups I feel connected to (helping, volunteering, etc.). - Fe: Not necessarily.
40) I see and pursue new possibilities. - Ne: Everyone does this! It's what the human brain naturally does.
41) I'm always planning what I'll do next. - Te/Ni: Most people plan at least somewhat.
42) I notice whether the details in front of me match what I am accustomed to. - Si: Maybe.
43) I prefer to indulge in that which exists in the present moment. - Se: It's shaky, but alright.
44) I create mental imagery independent of outer stimuli. - Ni: Who hasn't daydreamed about random stuff before?
45) In order to maintain or establish relationships with other people I act to meet their needs. - Fe: Surely everyone does this except people with disorders.
46) I rely on past experience and use it as a guide for the present. - Si: Okay.
47) I possess an extremely detailed internal map of past memories. - Si: Meh.
48) There is nothing more important than the 'here and now'. - Se: Western society tells us that the present is most important anyway.
49) I get insights that seem to come out of thin air and I have learned to rely on them. - Ni: Everyone gets these. Ironically it is said Sensors rely on them without questioning more than the Ns.
50) I dislike myself. Fi: Totally irrelevant.
51) I am preoccupied with experiencing the sensory details in what is happening right now. - Se: Fine.
52) What makes rational sense is the most important guide. - Ti? Te?: Very vague. Fi/Fe values are probably rational to the individual as well.
53) I objectively measure the external world to achieve measurable goals. - Te: Meh.
54) I stick to a predictable routine. - Si: I'm guessing that the vast majority do whatever the function.
55) I dislike repetition. - Ne: Most people get annoyed by it.
56) I serve others. - Fe: Poorly worded. Who wants to admit to that?
57) I value the scientific method. - Te: Well, the scientific method is very Te. But other types can value it similarly.
58) I love indie rock. - Fi: What?
59) I am good at laying out methods for others to complete tasks in time and resource-efficient ways. - Te: Okay I suppose.
60) I have magical thinking or odd beliefs. - Ni: More likely to be associated with people who have thinking disorders and/or are delusional.
Te (Extroverted Thinking) (70%)
your valuation of / adherence to logic of external systems / hierarchies / methods
Ti (Introverted Thinking) (100%)
your valuation of / adherence to your own internally devised logic/rational
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (70%)
your valuation of / tendency towards free association and creating with external stimuli
Ni (Introverted Intuition) (95%)
your valuation of / tendency towards internal/original free association and creativity
Se (Extroverted Sensing) (15%)
your valuation of / tendency to fully experience the world unfiltered, in the moment
Si (Introverted Sensing) (65%)
your valuation of / focus on internal sensations and reliving past moments
Fe (Extroverted Feeling) (95%)
your valuation of / adherence to external morals, ethics, traditions, customs, groups
Fi (Introverted Feeling) (70%)
your valuation of / adherence to the sanctity of your own feelings / ideals / sentiment
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
based on your results your type is likely - intp
Fi (Introverted Feeling) (90%)
your valuation of / adherence to the sanctity of your own feelings / ideals / sentiment
Si (Introverted Sensing) (90%)
your valuation of / focus on internal sensations and reliving past moments
Ni (Introverted Intuition) (60%)
your valuation of / tendency towards internal/original free association and creativity
Fe (Extroverted Feeling) (60%)
your valuation of / adherence to external morals, ethics, traditions, customs, groups
Te (Extroverted Thinking) (60%)
your valuation of / adherence to logic of external systems / hierarchies / methods
Ti (Introverted Thinking) (60%)
your valuation of / adherence to your own internally devised logic/rational
Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (50%)
your valuation of / tendency towards free association and creating with external stimuli
Se (Extroverted Sensing) (40%)
your valuation of / tendency to fully experience the world unfiltered, in the moment
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
based on your results your type is likely - infp
This is really chaotic
Wow, I've missed a whole discussion about myself. I hope it doesn't look to any people who know a lot about typology (and are favorably disposed towards me) that I'm not INFJ, because then I really don't know what I'd do. I guess I'd have to go back to XNTP again, and I've decided I don't fit it as well.
Regarding types I get along with:
INTP- really well generally
INTJ- combination of great and horrible
INFJ- ok, but I don't know many irl
ENFP- really well as friends
INFP- kind of unstable
ISFP- great, but they don't tend to be very intellectual
ENTJ- pretty well overall
ESTJ- one good friend
ISTP- one good friend
ESTP, ISTJ, ISFJ, ESFJ not much experience
ENFJ- rather volatile
I can get along pretty well with anyone unless they go out of their way to mess with me.
[MENTION=15371]RaptorWizard[/MENTION]: That's weird you got higher with Fi and Te than Fe and Ti. I've always thought you had very little of either. Granted, your judging functions don't jump out at me in general. I've always thought of you as a Ti user, but your Ti process always seems to be filtered through or mixed with some other kind of abstraction. You examine things, but it's never in a concrete or straightforward way. You are way more mystical and metaphysical than any INTP I've ever encountered. Even my Ni-dominated Ti use seems more directly analytical than much of your musings. So I'm going against the current and leaning away from INTP, although I really don't see you as INTJ either, and for certain not INFP. You are no kind of Fi dominant.
Although it must be said that I have not read through all of your cosmology threads- perhaps if I do I'll revise my opinion.
Somewhat unrelated gripe: Remember people telling me I couldn't be INTP because I was so confused? What happened to that? Obviously if RW is INTP he's a notable exception.
and see if you get similar results. I know the first one switches my Fe and Fi results from the one on similarminds. I like to take all three of them periodically and see which ones are most consistent.
EDIT: I think the second one is kind of lame, because the questions are worded in such a way that they sound attractive to any type of person. However, it's still good to get more data just to see how it fits with the rest.
quiz1:
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************ (24.4)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) *********************** (23.4)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************** (38.7)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *************************************** (39.3)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ***************** (17.2)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ***************************************** (41.6)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************ (24.5)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ******************************* (31.5)
good use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTP
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENTP, or INFP
Most Likely: ISTJ
or Second Possibility: INFP
or Third Possibility: INTP
Your cognitive functions are, in order of development:
Si - Fi - Ti - Ni - Ne - Te - Se - Fe
and see if you get similar results. I know the first one switches my Fe and Fi results from the one on similarminds. I like to take all three of them periodically and see which ones are most consistent.
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) **************** (16.8)
limited use
introverted Sensing (Si) ****************************** (30.9)
good use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ********************************** (34)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ******************************************* (43.3)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************************ (36.2)
excellent use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************************** (28.2)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************* (25.6)
EDIT: I think the second one is kind of lame, because the questions are worded in such a way that they sound attractive to any type of person. However, it's still good to get more data just to see how it fits with the rest.
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) **************** (16.8)
limited use
introverted Sensing (Si) ****************************** (30.9)
good use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ********************************** (34)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ******************************************* (43.3)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************************ (36.2)
excellent use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************************** (28.2)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************* (25.6)
Well, if you consistently test as high on Te and Fi, I suppose you could be INTJ. You just don't seem like one to me.
To be fair, you don't seem like an F. The functions and the archetype for INFJ just seem to fit. I don't think I seem like an F either. But like I say, INTX fits well for you too. I just want to leave no stone unturned, and explore the path less traveled.
[MENTION=15371]RaptorWizard[/MENTION]: That's weird you got higher with Fi and Te than Fe and Ti. I've always thought you had very little of either. Granted, your judging functions don't jump out at me in general. I've always thought of you as a Ti user, but your Ti process always seems to be filtered through or mixed with some other kind of abstraction. You examine things, but it's never in a concrete or straightforward way. You are way more mystical and metaphysical than any INTP I've ever encountered. Even my Ni-dominated Ti use seems more directly analytical than much of your musings. So I'm going against the current and leaning away from INTP, although I really don't see you as INTJ either, and for certain not INFP. You are no kind of Fi dominant.
I don't see myself as INFJ. The chances of me being F are very little to none. I definately can use F very strongly sometimes, but my natural state is much more to reason things out. It makes sense that my reasonings are put to the service of very mystical and esoteric metaphysical conceptions, something INTPs seem to be uncomfortable with. Of course, I'm also deeply interested in the findings of science, but it's mainly to have more pieces for building up better and higher ideas. I guess you could say I see myself as an integrative systems and processes thinker.
Although it must be said that I have not read through all of your cosmology threads- perhaps if I do I'll revise my opinion.
It would take way too long to look at all of that stuff - I've been writing those crazy ramblings for 3 years now.
Somewhat unrelated gripe: Remember people telling me I couldn't be INTP because I was so confused? What happened to that? Obviously if RW is INTP he's a notable exception.
It might be because we aren't INTP; either that or we're just very different from most people in general, even INTPs. Still, the craziest of the crazy seem to be the INJs, so perhaps we can build bridges to that platform.
I definately can use F very strongly sometimes, but my natural state is much more to reason things out. It makes sense that my reasonings are put to the service of very mystical and esoteric metaphysical conceptions, something INTPs seem to be uncomfortable with. Of course, I'm also deeply interested in the findings of science, but it's mainly to have more pieces for building up better and higher ideas. I guess you could say I see myself as an integrative systems and processes thinker.
I would say all this applies to me as well, and the bolded was why I thought for so long that I was a T. Just sayin. Do you not resonate with the archetype, or just being a feeler? True, you don't seem like a counselor or confidante, but being a mystic and spiritual investigator fits exactly.
Take a look at famous INFJ's- they're pretty awesome! And INFJ's are most frequently mistyped as INTP's and INTJ's.
You're young. You may yet grow and evolve drastically, and settle on a type once your functions are fully developed around 30.
I would say all this applies to me as well, and the bolded was why I thought for so long that I was a T. Just sayin. Do you not resonate with the archetype, or just being a feeler? True, you don't seem like a counselor or confidante, but being a mystic and spiritual investigator fits exactly.
Okay, well that's 11 years down the road. Surely I can make better progress in other directions for now, though things like a type would certainly help to support the developments.
Okay, well that's 11 years down the road. Surely I can make better progress in other directions for now, though things like a type would certainly help to support the developments.
And all of my type opinions of the past have helped in my development. So I think whatever people are, as long as they take it as an opportunity for personal growth they will be fine.
