Jaguar
Active member
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 20,647
I want to know more about your theories. I like wasting time on the internet.
Go learn the function-attitudes.
I want to know more about your theories. I like wasting time on the internet.
Go learn the function-attitudes.
From you, not from a website or book.
[MENTION=13589]Mal12345[/MENTION] better not watch that video. He thinks looking past appearances is Si.
Go learn the function-attitudes on your own. You might even become so bold as to read Jung's work for the first time in your life. Good luck with that.
You always post rubbish like that to cover up your ignorance of type models and Jungian concepts.
Go learn the difference between Ni and Si. And while you're at it, go learn all of the function-attitudes; something you have yet to do, but don't even realize.
*waits for yet another moronic pic to be posted*
Is your herring red, or blue?
Red pill/blue pill - red meme/blue meme. And he didn't say ONE THING about Si in that video.
Go learn the function-attitudes and quit posting red herring bullshit.
No Si.
I would guess ENTJ 3w4.
Why not ESFP 6w8?
Because 6 can't have an 8 wing.
[MENTION=13589]Mal12345[/MENTION] better not watch that video. He thinks looking past appearances is Si.
Trick question! Fooled ya!
Synopsis of video.
I'm going to discuss the differences between ESTP and ENTJ. They are both extraverts:
ESTP uses Se a LOT, and some Ti, and kinda uses Fe, but only a eeny-weeny bit of Ni.
ENTJ uses Te a LOT, and some Ni, a little less Se, and a lot less Fi.
View attachment 12279
How many red herrings does it take to make a sandwich?