No emiotion means no F. Peace is for the IP.
Feeling does not equal emotion. Feeling is about ethic, and value-based judgment: what things mean to people. Maintaining calm and serenity does not mean the F functions are not involved in decision-making. And we can look at any impassioned INTP and see the reverse is true, as well. And all types can value peace. My ESFJ boyfriend is very much about peace - he is a 9w1, after all.
There is no ignorance, there is knowledge
So INTP.
Since when have INTPs had a monopoly on knowledge? As far as I know, all people of all types can prize knowledge over ignorance. As an N-dominant I consider my own highest focus
ideas and concepts, which I also consider knowledge, though perhaps a different sort than the INTP prizes.
No passion means certainly no F. Serenity is IP.
Again, passion is not monopolized by F types. Nor is calm and quiet monopolized by IPs. Passion
may be utilized by F types in some decision-making but there is no necessity for that.
Yes, agreed.
There is no death, there is the Force.
There's nothing related to INFJ epecially in that.
Actually, the change of frame of reference is very INxJ. It's a new way of looking at things. Death is not the usually-thought disappearance into nothing; it is instead synthesis with the Force.
Yoda is a rude teacher who harshly tell the truth. He has low social skills. And if he is patient with you, when it's time to test you he will not take you by the hand, he will throw you in the water and you'll either sink or swim. He's clearly not a T, we just have to compare him with Luke or Padmé to see that. A crucial argument that the supporter of the INFJ theory avoid to face. He's even less emotional than Obi-Wan, who is a T.
Just because he is less
emotional does not make him a T. My ESFJ 9w1 boyfriend is far less emotional than my INTP 6w5 dad, who is regularly in some fiery state. I am not avoiding that argument; I am saying it is a logical fallacy. Feeling
is not emotion. They are two totally separate concepts, though they can involve one another, and to believe they require one another is to have a very poor grasp on both concepts. The same holds true for believing that a "harsh" teacher could only be a T. I am a fan of sink-or-swim, too, and I am an F! If you have faith that the person can succeed - a typical NF sort of belief - then there is no cruelty in sink-or-swim, because you know that the person will be just fine. It's not about social skills at all, it's about the application of NF style humanistic growth to an individual. Your arguments here are rooted purely in stereotype.
And yes, INTP are passive and detached anlysers. That's what Yoda is. But INFJs are not. They are chart-the-course, not behind-the-scene, they set projects, are organised and work hard toward them. Padmé, Shmi Skywalker, Dooku and Bail Organa are true INFJs. The difference with Yoda is very clear.
Yoda is the leader of arguably the most powerful underground rebel organization in the galaxy working to stop the growing forces of the Dark Side and actively promoting peace and justice through the utilization of philosophical teachings combined with instructing quasi-martial art training and political diplomacy. That makes him primarily a passive and detached analyzer?
If you were 900 years old you might step back and take a breath every now and then, too.
And the whole "philosophy" thing doesn't prove anything. INTPs are philosophers too. But Yoda is not driven by emotional attachements and value judgments like INFJs are.
Once again, Fe is not about emotional attachment. It is about interpersonal harmony. It is about understanding ties between things. Just like this:
Yoda said:
Its energy surrounds us and binds us. Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force around you; here, between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes. Even between the land and the ship.