SillySapienne
`~~Philosoflying~~`
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2008
- Messages
- 9,801
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 4w5
I wonder who you're thinking of as you wrote this post, hmm....NO STUPID ENTPs ARE THE WORST!!!OMGZ1111!!
I wonder who you're thinking of as you wrote this post, hmm....NO STUPID ENTPs ARE THE WORST!!!OMGZ1111!!
NO STUPID ENTPs ARE THE WORST!!!OMGZ1111!!
Here's where, if I paid any attention to Fi, I'd probably melt down and erroneously assume that use of the phrase "stupid ENTPs" somehow implies that all ENTPs must be stupid.
Of course, since I'm not a flaming moron with the IQ of a flagpole, I don't assume that. There certainly are stupid ENTPs and I can accept this fact without getting butt-hurt and imagining nonexistent insults toward all ENTPs.
Amazing, no?
Not amazed. No matter how badly you might want me to be.
That's too bad. I hope the NFP population of this forum will pick up this memo and give it some thought, but somehow I know better.
You fantasize about it when you're alone in your bed don't you?
I see a trend!
NT's main quality that people dislike is that NT's stand behind their opinions and thoughts as if they're right. Even though they aren't always. That they think they are smarter than anyone else.
This is a wrong and ironic observation. And I will explain why!
Every healthy person, regardless of type, stand behind their opinions and thoughts as if they're right. Even though they aren't always. Everyone thinks they are smarter than others. Wether you're T or F. You have your opinions and you reached those opinions through a certain method. Be it a rational NT way, or through feeling and emotion (As we rationals say, irrational.). Your way is the right way. If you didn't think that, you need to work on your self esteem.
And so also are some F's here pertaining that we are wrong, simply because they think they are right. But who's to say who is right and wrong? Hey wait a minute, I do!
So do I have news for you! What works for some people, doesn't work for others. Everyone has their own right and wrong. Smartness is therefor an individual factor that isn't comparable as a consensus. Only from certain perspectives and point of views. Take another persons point of view, and different conclusions will be found.
Here's a thought. Since I realise this, and so many other people seem to ignore this all important aspect of smartness. Does that make me better than the rest?
trying....not...to..be.sarcastic....................
ughhhhhh can't fight it.
wow, fluffy! that's so profound.
Here's where, if I paid any attention to Fi, I'd probably melt down and erroneously assume that use of the phrase "stupid ENTPs" somehow implies that all ENTPs must be stupid.
Of course, since I'm not a flaming moron with the IQ of a flagpole, I don't assume that. There certainly are stupid ENTPs and I can accept this fact without getting butt-hurt and imagining nonexistent insults toward all ENTPs.
Amazing, no?
Just my two cents:
One might say my INFJ foreman, both of my NT ex-bfs, and I should not, for all intents and purposes, enjoy heavy equipment, heavy physical labor, being covered in oil and grime, and managing dangerous engines, but we were there. We loved the machines for many of the same reasons as the SPs and SJs that surrounded us.
In my experience, extroverted NTs can sound *very* sensory. My ENTJ best friend comes off as an ESTJ frequently and even tests as one sometimes, but so many other ENTJs I know well. Speak to them for a minute, and you'll know they're N dominants. Consider that an extroverted NT might be more inclined to test the waters, try the fugu, take a dare, etc because they're experiencers. They want to see what happens when XYZ occurs, even if it seems perhaps inadvisable.
On the other hand, I've also known S-primaries to seem very N unless you examine them closely. I wouldn't take certain "traits", per se, such as pursuits and hobbies, to delineate one's entire image of a person until you can see how they apply themselves or how they were raised.
What annoys me is usually the whole 'I have no feelings and if I do, I don't allow them to influence me, unlike *some* people! :steam:'
yeah...you clearly aren't emo *pats on the shoulder*
Delusional much?
I rarely dislike NTs
This thread is weird and pointless, we are pretty used to being disliked by the mass SJ population now we get to hear about it online too? Yay?
There's already mass bias regarding NTs
It wouldn't be hard to find a list of stuff to hate about NTs just go ask anyone from the general population what kind of person pisses them off
Got self-esteem issues, hmm?
I rarely dislike NTs
This thread is weird and pointless, we are pretty used to being disliked by the mass SJ population now we get to hear about it online too? Yay?
There's already mass bias regarding NTs
It wouldn't be hard to find a list of stuff to hate about NTs just go ask anyone from the general population what kind of person pisses them off
Frustration seems pretty common among NTs, especially when NFs assume emotional subtext in everything we say rather than focusing on our logic
Dah we can seem emotional or expressive at times but that doesn't mean we value it or want it talked about
Unfortunately, not. In fact, I probably need to be pulled down a few notches to get my head out of the lofty clouds, which is what NTs love to do most, right?
Seriously, though, I've noticed NTs cling to being right so hard that they have difficulty compromising. Whether that is within an arguement, or whether that is about an ideal. It's like to concede even one little point is admitting total defeat.......or failure? Then a resultant byproduct of that is anger that seeps out the corners. Yet when called out on sounding angry, NTs might yell, "NF is projecting your feelings onto me!" Haha. As if.