^ It suffered the same problem as 300 2, while the first movies of both franchises were impressive and stylish when they came out, the sequels just seemed very commonplace. In the case of Sin City 2, however, the whole thing just felt rushed. I couldn't get interested in it. There was nothing that really stood out and the whole thing felt like a TV movie. I think I'm going to remember The Spirit more than I will remember Sin City 2, and that was the movie's biggest sin.
Unfortunately I was not a fan of it.I saw the movie Locke last night. It is a truly excellent movie, a work of art. Go and see it.
Click on the trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_METW96TAFw
Unfortunately I was not a fan of it.
Man, you certainly assume too much. I can go on and on with you about European and Asian experimental and arthouse films. But sure, anybody who doesn't appreciate Locke must belong to the pop culture trash bag. What a laugh.Yes, the movie Locke did not pander to popular tastes.
It did not push the usual buttons pushed by popular culture.
Locke is a cinematic work of art, and requires a cultivated taste to be enjoyed.
Yes, Locke is for those with good taste.
Man, you certainly assume too much. I can go on and on with you about European and Asian experimental and arthouse films. But sure, anybody who doesn't appreciate Locke must belong to the pop culture trash bag. What a laugh.
There was nothing original or special about Locke. I think I recall it having a cool song in it though... It wanted to be stylish and cool, but there just was nothing compelling about it in my opinion.
I finally saw Pulp Fiction way better than expected considering I couldn't stand Django or the Kill Bill series. Not usually a fan of taratino films, feels like they try to hard.