You're not an INTP, that's for sure. Just saying "I hate Fe" and "I use Te" over and over doesn't necessarily mean you understand them and I don't get any indication either way. It seems like you've decided you want to be an NT and so you're going straight to the functions to describe yourself to expedite people agreeing with you.
"Oh, you say you are dominant in Te. Well, based on my extensive knowledge of mbti that would make you ENTJ. Yes I think so."
I'm going to go with ENFP based on what I've seen of your posts.
I think you're implying, "you seem like you have a problem accepting F", by pointing out how much of a "grasping for anything T" argument its ending up as. Im sorry if thats not what you implied. Anyways, thats kind of the point. Why do most S's that I know, have no problem being S? Why are most of the self typed T people I know, not wanting to be F? Why are the F's usually happy about not being "mean, cold and empathetic" (not that thats a true stereotype)?
The idea that I "want to be" NT is not exactly true. However, it kind of isn't far off in that it occurred to me:
"Wait, why do those ideals of NT temperament sound so much more like me?" Yes, it can be true that people often want what they can't have. I just started to wonder, "Maybe its because I actually
am NT".
Secondly, I definitely see where it appears that I might be arguing for Te. Thats kind of the point I guess. I often put forth a point and let it stand out there until it gets toppled down. If it doesn't get knocked down, if its defendable, then why would I reject it? If everyone here immediately said, "BC there is no way you are a T", then me arguing for Te would kind of expedite the process of that backlash would it not?
Thirdly, I have IRL argued for my F'ness. Most people IRL that know about MBTI assume i'm a T when ever MBTI is first brought up, then I usually argue for my F'ness. So I dunno... I guess trust me on the fact that I have argued hard for F in the past as well??? I can and have over argued for being F too. I guess it comes down to which over-arguing is correct: tertiary Te with auxiliary Fi? or Te 1st/2nd then Fi 3rd/4th, or some other combo that better describes me?
If you split me up into two opposing forces, I could build a strong case for either T or F...so it doesn't help when I'm trying to describe myself. I mean, it
does help... its not like I make up examples. There would be, and are, examples that I see for both sides.
I will definitely take note that you agree with my earlier self's typing of myself as ENFP. I also agree that I am not INTP.