Thalassa
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 25,183
- MBTI Type
- ISFP
- Enneagram
- 6w7
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
The recent thread on damaged instincts made me wonder if the people who are labelled "co-dependent" or "emo" or "needy" or "overbearing" or even "whores" are just manifesting the dominant sexual instinct in a way that non-sx doms fail to understand.
Same with some people seeming "conformist" or "nosy" (so dom?)/"overly cautious" or "selfish" or "materialistic" or "distant" (sp dom?)
Are we all just judging people who don't share our dom instinct, is no one as broken as everyone is trying to make it out to be?
I know there are broken people, but I'm starting to get sick all of the theories that say everyone is sick or damaged or fucked up in some way. Maybe we're supposed to be the way we are (within reason).
I've seen a lot of this shit lately, I could go on and on, like there was a thread on another personality forum called "worst reasons to date someone" and frankly they all seemed like a matter of opinion, like a bunch of people with idealistically romantic ideas looking down on people who date for more practical or biological reasons.
Same with some people seeming "conformist" or "nosy" (so dom?)/"overly cautious" or "selfish" or "materialistic" or "distant" (sp dom?)
Are we all just judging people who don't share our dom instinct, is no one as broken as everyone is trying to make it out to be?
I know there are broken people, but I'm starting to get sick all of the theories that say everyone is sick or damaged or fucked up in some way. Maybe we're supposed to be the way we are (within reason).
I've seen a lot of this shit lately, I could go on and on, like there was a thread on another personality forum called "worst reasons to date someone" and frankly they all seemed like a matter of opinion, like a bunch of people with idealistically romantic ideas looking down on people who date for more practical or biological reasons.