Jack Flak
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,098
- MBTI Type
- type
Thanks.Ah, but you're above mere psychology!
Thanks.Ah, but you're above mere psychology!
Well...What I intended to separate there was being right about impersonal matters (correctness) vs. being right about personal matters (justice). I may reword it though, if I can think of something better which remains vague enough.Hmmm, I have a slight problem with question 5. Specifically, I'm not sure that there's a real difference between being "just" and being correct. If I am correct in my judgment, then I will have decided justly.
Or am I missing something?
Well...What I intended to separate there was being right about impersonal matters (correctness) vs. being right about personal matters (justice). I may reword it though, if I can think of something better which remains vague enough.
But being that you misunderstood, it may still be better off reworded.Oh, so it's like a variation of the subjective/objective split? I was confused because I didn't view justice as a personal matter, since we usually determine the justness of a decision by how well it measures up to what is factually correct. I misunderstood.
Question five has been changed from
a. I am almost always just.
b. I am almost always correct.
To:
a. I am almost always sympathetic.
b. I am almost always correct.
Better?
I really don't like the design. And I couldn't get a result, this sort of thing will only work for people with no subtlety.
That was designed in intentionally, believe it or not, hence "Fail-Safe," so people who don't self-evaluate properly won't mis-type as often. Sorry!Dinosaur Man said:Also, I failed your test. It says I am an IXTX (I - TJ - N- P -T - I - S) .
Is there some better way I could word "truest" so people will understand. Should I say "less untrue?" lol. I DON'T KNOW!Dinosaur Man said:Jack Flak, I found most your questions too unequivocal and not abstract enough; for example, I am never 'almost always' anything, well perhaps a jackass.![]()
That was designed in intentionally, believe it or not, hence "Fail-Safe," so people who don't self-evaluate properly won't mis-type as often. Sorry!
I didn't say you were mistyped. I want as few people as possible to come up with incorrect preferences on the test itself. If you're truly T, I think it's better to receive INxP than INFP.I'm not mistyped. I am strongly differentiated.
You can do better.
Looks like I am an IxxP on your test.
1.b
2.b
3b.d
4.b
5.a
6.a
7.a
I didn't say you were mistyped. I want as few people as possible to come up with incorrect preferences on the test itself. If you're truly T, I think it's better to receive INxP than INFP.
I would really like to hear the validity of the test from people who aren't familiar with tests, as well, to remove the knowledge bias from the equation.
I am INTP. Unequivocally. If your test can't type people with strongly expressed preferences, then it FAILS.
Is this your way of telling me that I can't be a J as I never read instructions because I am too lazy?Is there some better way I could word "truest" so people will understand. Should I say "less untrue?" lol. I DON'T KNOW!