Thalassa
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 25,183
- MBTI Type
- ISFP
- Enneagram
- 6w7
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
It is damn too. All those in favor of nuclear excitement are recognising that aspects of the collapse can be exciting, while the anti-nuclear wowsers are requiring us all to get buried under the entirety of this one, unitary, monolithic, and realistically conceived-in-detail death's head mushroom cloud. It's insanely conservative picture-making, no other imagery allowed.
Which is entirely bizarre because just how many books and movies are now out of bounds? For that matter, and a whole lot more seriously on a pseudo-psychology forum, though apparently no one has seen fit to recognise this, but what are you people saying to actual troops who come back from actual battle in actual concrete circumstance of death and murder, and they say, THAT WAS EXCITING!?
If there is even one person who nearly got blown up in Boston saying they were thrilled and excited by the sound and violence that didn't kill them.... THEY MUST BE SICK IN THE HEAD RIGHT?
I am surprise.
Besides, if it had been...
This Side of The Blast Radius (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1920)
The Beautiful and Bombed (New York: Scribners, 1922)
The Great Fat Boy (New York: Scribners, 1925)
Tender Is the Nuke (New York: Scribners, 1934)
and
The Love of the Last Tycoon (Because All The Others are Radioactive) –
THEN YOU'D BE PRO_BOMB 2
You should take this all up with Morrissey, being an INFP who has Si, who sang it's the bomb the bomb the bomb that will bring us together.
I think thunderstorms are exciting, but the possibility of people dying in a thunderstorm are far lower, and usually the rain does the land and animals good.
I care about things like the environment, animals, etc. to think that this is an exciting answer to 21st century corporate over-socialization.
I absolutely hate the idea of men doing more harm to innocent living things than they already have.
In my case it's Fi rigidity of morals, I know this to be a fact.