Nicodemus
New member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,756
Take your time, become confident. I will wait.ESTJ but I'm not confident.
Take your time, become confident. I will wait.ESTJ but I'm not confident.
So are you saying that your original typing of ESFP was to type YW and not InvisibleJim and now you're typing YW as an ESTP?
Why would I laugh at IJ being typed as an ESFP? It's more accurate than his self-typing of INTJ.. . . no ESFP was for InvisibleJim. I originally typed YW as INFP. (don't laugh I wasn't paying attention to what he was writing just how his voice came across to me)
Take your time, become confident. I will wait.
Why would I laugh at IJ being typed as an ESFP? It's more accurate than his self-typing of INTJ.
Great. Here is a conversation I had with another ESTP (a poster child, if you will):[MENTION=10757]Nicodemus[/MENTION] : ESTP. I'm confident.
nvm, you're an INTP. the chat helped not for the content but for the tone.Great. Here is a conversation I had with another ESTP (a poster child, if you will):
Nicodemus: Are you known among friends as a dance monster?
Friendo: Yes, I am.
Friendo: Not even only among friends. There are rumors about the "party beast".
Nicodemus: Haha.
Friendo: People I don't even know approach me with it when I'm in town.
Nicodemus: Are you proud of that?
Friendo: No. I don't care. Sometimes it's fun.
Nicodemus: I still find it interesting, because it really is as though you were from another star.
Friendo: I could say the same thing about you!
Nicodemus: Except that I am not as salient.
Friendo: You are in my opinion.
Nicodemus: I sit while you flounce around. One can hardly call that equal.
Friendo: Well, I find we diverge from the norm in just very different ways.
Friendo: Partly in opposing ones, which, of course, makes it all the more interesting.
Nicodemus: Yes.
Friendo: The reason-based commonalities, then, are the icing on the cake.
Would it have any bearing on your judgment to know that we were both drunk during the conversation? Also, it is a translation of a German chat, with punctuation added and corrected.nvm, you're an INTP. the chat helped not for the content but for the tone.
Would it have any bearing on your judgment to know that we were both drunk during the conversation?
.
. . .but i f I go back to the posts I saw before think you sound like an INFP again. :S Idk what to think.
I am not trying to tell you anything. I am trying to figure out if there is any method to your typing method.uhm . . . i don't think so . . . are you trying to tell me you think INTP is wrong?
Here is her first post: http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24559&p=1656015&viewfull=1#post1656015Only 200 posts and you already start typing people ? That's ambitious
One word of advice tho, dont go down that road too seriously, what people show to the outside and what people are, is very different. And from experience I can tell you, if you think of your abilities in that regards too highly, it will end in frustration for you.
Now type me
... so, doesn't this all just mean that there really isn't a pattern you're seeking but rather your judgment is completely contextual and dependent on a specific phrase/'tone' uttered? There's no holistic pattern to your typing - it's purely based on an individual post. Hence your having to change your typing of someone multiple times, based on each different thing they might say.
Only 200 posts and you already start typing people ? That's ambitious
One word of advice tho, dont go down that road too seriously, what people show to the outside and what people are, is very different. And from experience I can tell you, if you think of your abilities in that regards too highly, it will end in frustration for you.
Now type me
I think it is safe to say at this point that your method or, rather, the lack thereof produces no reliable results. When a method produces no reliable results, it is to be discarded.[MENTION=10757]Nicodemus[/MENTION] : You're an INFP. 100% confident this time not only cause of your voice but because of how you and the ESTP were like 'we are so fascinatingly different!"
I did before. INFP.
I think it is safe to say at this point that your method or, rather, the lack thereof produces no reliable results. When a method produces no reliable results, it is to be discarded.
Have you noticed that you went from ESTJ to INFP in a little more than an hour?